TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)vs21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)

See exactly how AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls map to 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
22
Gaps Found
8%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) maps to 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) with 8% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls identifies 23 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Incident Response and Recovery.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Security Management and Governance(2 mappings)

AWWA-1.1Security Policy and Governance2 targets
→58.1Scope
→58.3Definitions

Access Control and Identity Management(1 mappings)

AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls
→58.43Animal Care Facilities

Related Comparisons

Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines18 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs CSA CCM v418 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation18 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)18 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs South Korea ISMS-P18 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security17 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange17 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs Azure Security Benchmark16 mappings

Other 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)4 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)4 mappingsUK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 vs 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)4 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)3 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)3 mappingsISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)3 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)3 mappingsSSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) vs 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)3 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)?

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) has 25 controls across its framework, while 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Incident Response and Recovery, where 9 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls have no direct 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) equivalent.

How many controls map between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)?

Of 25 total AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls, 2 map directly to 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 23 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) to 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)?

23 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls have no direct equivalent in 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP). The highest concentration of gaps is in Incident Response and Recovery with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Incident Response and Recovery (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.