Cross-Framework Mapping

SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)vs21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)

See exactly how SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) controls map to 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
24
Gaps Found
7%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) maps to 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) with 7% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 27 SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) controls identifies 25 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Control Environment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 27 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

IT General Controls(1 mappings)

ITGC-5Physical and Environmental Security
58.43Animal Care Facilities

Reporting and Monitoring(2 mappings)

RM-3Monitoring of Controls2 targets
58.1Scope
58.3Definitions

Related Comparisons

Other SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) comparisons

Other 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) and 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)?

SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) has 27 controls across its framework, while 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Control Environment, where 10 SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) controls have no direct 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) equivalent.

How many controls map between SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) and 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)?

Of 27 total SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) controls, 2 map directly to 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) controls — representing 7% coverage. The remaining 25 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) to 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)?

25 SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) controls have no direct equivalent in 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP). The highest concentration of gaps is in Control Environment with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) and 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Control Environment (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.