TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9vsWCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)

See exactly how BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls map to WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
18
Gaps Found
29%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 maps to WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021) with 29% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 28 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls identifies 20 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Product and Process Control.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 28 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Food Safety and Quality Management System(6 mappings)

3.1Food Safety and Quality Manual
→CTPAT-SCS-03Conveyance and Cargo Security
3.2Document Control
→CTPAT-SCS-03Conveyance and Cargo Security
3.4Internal Audits
→CTPAT-SCS-03Conveyance and Cargo Security
3.5Management of Suppliers3 targets
→AEO-SC-4Trading Partner Security
→NRF-4Supply Chain Risk Identification
→NRF-5Third-Party Partner Standards

Site Standards(2 mappings)

4.1External Standards
→CTPAT-SCS-03Conveyance and Cargo Security
4.2Building Fabric and Facilities
→CTPAT-SCS-03Conveyance and Cargo Security

Product and Process Control(1 mappings)

5.3Management of Allergens
→CTPAT-SCS-03Conveyance and Cargo Security

Personnel(1 mappings)

7.1Training and Competence
→CTPAT-SCS-03Conveyance and Cargo Security

Related Comparisons

Other BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 comparisons

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence12 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs FDA Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR)12 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System12 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs ISO/IEC 27003:201712 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products12 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories12 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence12 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements12 mappings

Other WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021) comparisons

WCO Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Framework vs WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)12 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)11 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)11 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)11 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)11 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)11 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)11 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)11 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)?

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 has 28 controls across its framework, while WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021) covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (29% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Product and Process Control, where 5 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls have no direct WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021) equivalent.

How many controls map between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)?

Of 28 total BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls, 8 map directly to WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021) controls — representing 29% coverage. The remaining 20 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 to WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)?

20 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls have no direct equivalent in WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021). The highest concentration of gaps is in Product and Process Control with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Product and Process Control (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.