TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility CybersecurityvsWCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)

See exactly how NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity controls map to WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

29
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
40%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity maps to WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021) with 40% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity controls identifies 15 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 29 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Security Controls(20 mappings)

CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue2 targets
→AEO-SC-3Premises Security
→UKTSA-SC-04Third-Party Access Controls
KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management3 targets
→NRF-4Supply Chain Risk Identification
→WCO-SAFE-SCS-01Advance Electronic Information
→WCO-SAFE-SCS-02Risk Management
KR-CSAP-SC-02Infrastructure and Network Security2 targets
→AEO-SC-3Premises Security
→CTPAT-SCS-01Physical Security
MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection2 targets
→AEO-SC-3Premises Security
→UKTSA-SC-04Third-Party Access Controls
MARSE-SC-03Identity Verification
→CTPAT-SCS-02Personnel Security
NRC73-CTL-05Supply Chain Security for CDAs3 targets
→AEO-SC-4Trading Partner Security
→NRF-4Supply Chain Risk Identification
→NRF-5Third-Party Partner Standards
NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management5 targets
→CTPAT-SCS-02Personnel Security
→NRF-4Supply Chain Risk Identification
→NRF-6Vendor Risk Management
→WCO-SAFE-SCS-01Advance Electronic Information
→WCO-SAFE-SCS-02Risk Management
NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud2 targets
→NRF-4Supply Chain Risk Identification
→WCO-SAFE-AF-02Mutual Recognition

+9 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity comparisons

NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation17 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs FedRAMP Rev 517 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs South Korea ISMS-P17 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange17 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.016 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments16 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management16 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)16 mappings

Other WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021) comparisons

WCO Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Framework vs WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)12 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)11 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)11 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)11 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)11 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)11 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)11 mappingsAuthorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards vs WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)10 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity and WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)?

NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity has 25 controls across its framework, while WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021) covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (40% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security Controls, where 11 NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity controls have no direct WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021) equivalent.

How many controls map between NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity and WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)?

Of 25 total NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity controls, 10 map directly to WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021) controls — representing 40% coverage. The remaining 15 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity to WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)?

15 NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity controls have no direct equivalent in WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021). The highest concentration of gaps is in Security Controls with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity and WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security Controls (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.