Cross-Framework Mapping

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9vsAS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence

See exactly how BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls map to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
34
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 maps to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence with 10% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 39 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls identifies 35 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Senior Management Commitment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 39 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Food Safety and Quality Management System(5 mappings)

3.1Physical Security
8.5Control effectiveness review
3.2Establish and Maintain a Data Inventory
8.5Control effectiveness review
3.4Enforce Data Retention
8.5Control effectiveness review
3.5Securely Dispose of Data2 targets
AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, Services
ISO27003-8.1Operational Planning and Control

Related Comparisons

Other BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 comparisons

Other AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 has 39 controls across its framework, while AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Senior Management Commitment, where 4 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls have no direct AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence equivalent.

How many controls map between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

Of 39 total BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls, 4 map directly to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 35 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

35 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls have no direct equivalent in AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. The highest concentration of gaps is in Senior Management Commitment with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

The domain with the highest gap count is Senior Management Commitment (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.