Cross-Framework Mapping

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9vsNetherlands GDPR Implementation Act (UAVG — Uitvoeringswet AVG, 2018)

See exactly how BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls map to Netherlands GDPR Implementation Act (UAVG — Uitvoeringswet AVG, 2018). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
12
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 maps to Netherlands GDPR Implementation Act (UAVG — Uitvoeringswet AVG, 2018) with 14% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 28 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls identifies 24 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Product and Process Control.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 28 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Senior Management Commitment(10 mappings)

1.2Food Safety and Quality Culture5 targets
Art. 2Consent Definition
Art. 4Participating Institutions
Art. 41Exemptions from Certain GDPR Provisions
Sec. 2Interpretation
Sec. 3Scope and Application
1.3Organizational Structure and Responsibilities5 targets
Art. 2Consent Definition
Art. 4Participating Institutions
Art. 41Exemptions from Certain GDPR Provisions
Sec. 2Interpretation
Sec. 3Scope and Application

Food Safety and Quality Management System(6 mappings)

3.3Record Completion and Maintenance5 targets
Art. 2Consent Definition
Art. 4Participating Institutions
Art. 41Exemptions from Certain GDPR Provisions
Sec. 2Interpretation
Sec. 3Scope and Application
3.5Management of Suppliers
Art. 26Outsourcing of Personal Information Processing

Related Comparisons

Other BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 comparisons

Other Netherlands GDPR Implementation Act (UAVG — Uitvoeringswet AVG, 2018) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and Netherlands GDPR Implementation Act (UAVG — Uitvoeringswet AVG, 2018)?

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 has 28 controls across its framework, while Netherlands GDPR Implementation Act (UAVG — Uitvoeringswet AVG, 2018) covers 33 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Product and Process Control, where 6 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls have no direct Netherlands GDPR Implementation Act (UAVG — Uitvoeringswet AVG, 2018) equivalent.

How many controls map between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and Netherlands GDPR Implementation Act (UAVG — Uitvoeringswet AVG, 2018)?

Of 28 total BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls, 4 map directly to Netherlands GDPR Implementation Act (UAVG — Uitvoeringswet AVG, 2018) controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 to Netherlands GDPR Implementation Act (UAVG — Uitvoeringswet AVG, 2018)?

24 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls have no direct equivalent in Netherlands GDPR Implementation Act (UAVG — Uitvoeringswet AVG, 2018). The highest concentration of gaps is in Product and Process Control with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and Netherlands GDPR Implementation Act (UAVG — Uitvoeringswet AVG, 2018)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Product and Process Control (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.