Cross-Framework Mapping

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9vsBelgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018)

See exactly how BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls map to Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
22
Gaps Found
11%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 maps to Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) with 11% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 28 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls identifies 25 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Product and Process Control.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 28 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Senior Management Commitment(4 mappings)

1.2Food Safety and Quality Culture2 targets
BE-DPA-1Article 1 — Scope and Purpose
BE-DPA-2Article 2 — Definitions
1.3Organizational Structure and Responsibilities2 targets
BE-DPA-1Article 1 — Scope and Purpose
BE-DPA-2Article 2 — Definitions

Food Safety and Quality Management System(2 mappings)

3.3Record Completion and Maintenance2 targets
BE-DPA-1Article 1 — Scope and Purpose
BE-DPA-2Article 2 — Definitions

Related Comparisons

Other BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 comparisons

Other Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018)?

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 has 28 controls across its framework, while Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) covers 14 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Product and Process Control, where 6 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls have no direct Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) equivalent.

How many controls map between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018)?

Of 28 total BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls, 3 map directly to Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 25 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 to Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018)?

25 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls have no direct equivalent in Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018). The highest concentration of gaps is in Product and Process Control with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Product and Process Control (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.