Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27400:2022vsBelgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018)

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls map to Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
14
Gaps Found
22%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27400:2022 maps to Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) with 22% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls identifies 34 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 6: IoT Security Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Clause 1-4: Introduction and Framework(6 mappings)

27011-1Scope2 targets
BE-DPA-1Scope and application of the Act
BE-DPA-2Definitions
27011-3Terms and definitions2 targets
BE-DPA-1Scope and application of the Act
BE-DPA-2Definitions
27400-3Terms and definitions2 targets
BE-DPA-1Scope and application of the Act
BE-DPA-2Definitions

Clause 5: IoT Risk Sources(3 mappings)

27400-5.4Data and privacy risks3 targets
BE-DPA-11Transposition of the Law Enforcement Directive
BE-DPA-13Corrective powers and administrative fines
BE-DPA-5Processing of special categories for substantial public interest

Network(2 mappings)

27400-7.1Network Security for IoT2 targets
BE-DPA-14Criminal penalties
BE-DPA-7Processing of criminal conviction and offence data

Clause 7: IoT Privacy Controls(7 mappings)

27400-7.1Network Security for IoT2 targets
BE-DPA-14Criminal penalties
BE-DPA-7Processing of criminal conviction and offence data
27400-7.3Data minimization and purpose limitation3 targets
BE-DPA-11Transposition of the Law Enforcement Directive
BE-DPA-13Corrective powers and administrative fines
BE-DPA-5Processing of special categories for substantial public interest
27400-7.4Data retention and deletion2 targets
BE-DPA-14Criminal penalties
BE-DPA-7Processing of criminal conviction and offence data

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27400:2022 comparisons

Other Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018)?

ISO/IEC 27400:2022 has 32 controls across its framework, while Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (22% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 6: IoT Security Controls, where 5 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls have no direct Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018)?

Of 32 total ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls, 8 map directly to Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) controls — representing 22% coverage. The remaining 34 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27400:2022 to Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018)?

34 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018). The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 6: IoT Security Controls with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 6: IoT Security Controls (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.