Cross-Framework Mapping

Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018)vsBelgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018)

See exactly how Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls map to Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
57%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) maps to Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) with 57% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 14 Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 14 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Part 4: Remedies and Penalties(7 mappings)

AT-DSG-10Section 29 - Liability and right to compensation / civil jurisdiction2 targets
BE-DPA-14Criminal penalties
BE-DPA-7Processing of criminal conviction and offence data
AT-DSG-11Sections 42-45 - Data subject rights (law enforcement)3 targets
BE-DPA-11Transposition of the Law Enforcement Directive
BE-DPA-13Corrective powers and administrative fines
BE-DPA-5Processing of special categories for substantial public interest
AT-DSG-12Section 62 - Administrative penalties2 targets
BE-DPA-14Criminal penalties
BE-DPA-7Processing of criminal conviction and offence data

Part 5: Implementation of the Law Enforcement Directive(6 mappings)

AT-DSG-13Section 36 - Scope of law enforcement processing3 targets
BE-DPA-11Transposition of the Law Enforcement Directive
BE-DPA-13Corrective powers and administrative fines
BE-DPA-5Processing of special categories for substantial public interest
AT-DSG-14Section 38 - Lawfulness of law enforcement processing3 targets
BE-DPA-11Transposition of the Law Enforcement Directive
BE-DPA-13Corrective powers and administrative fines
BE-DPA-5Processing of special categories for substantial public interest

Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions(2 mappings)

AT-DSG-2Section 2 - Scope and application2 targets
BE-DPA-1Scope and application of the Act
BE-DPA-2Definitions

Part 3: Data Protection Authority(4 mappings)

AT-DSG-7Section 18 - Establishment of the Data Protection Authority2 targets
BE-DPA-14Criminal penalties
BE-DPA-7Processing of criminal conviction and offence data
AT-DSG-8Section 22 - Functions and powers of the DPA2 targets
BE-DPA-1Scope and application of the Act
BE-DPA-2Definitions

Related Comparisons

Other Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) comparisons

Other Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) and Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018)?

Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) has 14 controls across its framework, while Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (57% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions, where 4 Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls have no direct Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) equivalent.

How many controls map between Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) and Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018)?

Of 14 total Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls, 8 map directly to Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) controls — representing 57% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) to Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018)?

6 Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls have no direct equivalent in Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018). The highest concentration of gaps is in Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) and Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.