Cross-Framework Mapping

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security IncidentsvsFedRAMP Moderate

See exactly how ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls map to FedRAMP Moderate. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

106
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
97%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which FedRAMP Moderate controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents maps to FedRAMP Moderate with 97% coverage across 36 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls identifies 1 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Limiting the Extent of Cyber Security Incidents.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 878 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 106 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 878 frameworks.

Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution(20 mappings)

ASD37-01Application control (Essential)4 targets
→AC-6(10)Prohibit Non-Privileged Users from Executing Privileged Functions
→CM-11User-Installed Software
→CM-7(2)Prevent Program Execution
→CM-7(5)Authorized Software Allow-by-Exception
ASD37-02Patch applications (Essential)2 targets
→RA-5Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning
→SI-2Flaw Remediation
ASD37-03Configure Microsoft Office macro settings (Essential)3 targets
→CM-6Configuration Settings
→CM-7(2)Prevent Program Execution
→SC-18Mobile Code
ASD37-04User application hardening (Essential)3 targets
→CM-6Configuration Settings
→CM-7Least Functionality
→SC-18Mobile Code
ASD37-05Automated dynamic analysis of email and web content (Excellent)
→SI-3Malicious Code Protection
ASD37-06Email content filtering (Excellent)2 targets
→SI-3Malicious Code Protection
→SI-8Spam Protection
ASD37-07Web content filtering (Excellent)2 targets
→SC-7(8)Route Traffic to Authenticated Proxy Servers
→SI-3Malicious Code Protection
ASD37-08Deny direct internet connectivity (Excellent)3 targets
→AC-17(3)Managed Access Control Points
→AC-4Information Flow Enforcement
→SC-7(3)Access Points

+86 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 878 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents to FedRAMP Moderate crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which FedRAMP Moderate controls your existing ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents into FedRAMP Moderate lands at 14.9%, while FedRAMP Moderate into ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents lands at 83.8%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents evidence buys you for FedRAMP Moderate, the other asks the reverse.

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents into FedRAMP Moderate
14.9%

48 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents. 275 are genuine gaps.

FedRAMP Moderate into ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents
83.8%

31 of 37 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls are evidenced by work you have already done for FedRAMP Moderate. 6 are genuine gaps.

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents to FedRAMP Moderate
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 97% in the header counts how many ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many FedRAMP Moderate controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 878 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 878 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and FedRAMP Moderate?

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents has 37 controls across its framework, while FedRAMP Moderate covers 323 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 36 overlapping controls (97% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Limiting the Extent of Cyber Security Incidents, where 1 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct FedRAMP Moderate equivalent.

How many controls map between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and FedRAMP Moderate?

Of 37 total ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls, 36 map directly to FedRAMP Moderate controls, representing 97% coverage. The remaining 1 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents to FedRAMP Moderate?

1 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct equivalent in FedRAMP Moderate. The highest concentration of gaps is in Limiting the Extent of Cyber Security Incidents with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and FedRAMP Moderate?

The domain with the highest gap count is Limiting the Extent of Cyber Security Incidents (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.