Cross-Framework Mapping

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security IncidentsvsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5

See exactly how ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls map to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

119
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
100%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents maps to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 with 100% coverage across 37 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls identifies 0 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Limiting the Extent of Cyber Security Incidents.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 119 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution(20 mappings)

ASD37-01Application control (Essential)4 targets
NIST800-CM-10Software usage restrictions
NIST800-CM-11User-installed software
NIST800-CM-7Least functionality
NIST800-SI-3Malicious code protection
ASD37-02Patch applications (Essential)2 targets
NIST800-RA-5Vulnerability monitoring and scanning
NIST800-SI-2Flaw remediation
ASD37-03Configure Microsoft Office macro settings (Essential)3 targets
NIST800-CM-14Signed Components. Prevent the installation of [organization-defined] without verification that the component has been digitally signed using a certificate that is recognized and approved by the organization
NIST800-CM-6Configuration settings
NIST800-SC-18Mobile Code. Define acceptable and unacceptable mobile code and mobile code technologies; and Authorize, monitor, and control the use of mobile code within the system
ASD37-04User application hardening (Essential)6 targets
NIST800-CM-4Impact analyses
NIST800-CM-6Configuration settings
NIST800-CM-7Least functionality
NIST800-CM-9Configuration management plan
NIST800-SA-10Developer configuration management
NIST800-SC-18Mobile Code. Define acceptable and unacceptable mobile code and mobile code technologies; and Authorize, monitor, and control the use of mobile code within the system
ASD37-05Automated dynamic analysis of email and web content (Excellent)
NIST800-SC-44Detonation Chambers. Employ a detonation chamber capability within [organization-defined]
ASD37-06Email content filtering (Excellent)2 targets
NIST800-SI-3Malicious code protection
NIST800-SI-8Spam Protection. Employ spam protection mechanisms at system entry and exit points to detect and act on unsolicited messages; and Update spam protection mechanisms when new releases are available in accordance with organizational configuration
ASD37-07Web content filtering (Excellent)2 targets
NIST800-SC-7Boundary protection
NIST800-SI-3Malicious code protection

+99 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls your existing ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents into NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 lands at 10.3%, while NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 into ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents lands at 86.5%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents evidence buys you for NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5, the other asks the reverse.

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents into NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5
10.3%

31 of 300 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents. 269 are genuine gaps.

27.3%SI - System and Information Integrity
28.6%CM - Configuration Management
33.3%CP - Contingency Planning
8.5%SC - System and Communications Protection
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 74 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: NIST800-AC-3 Access enforcement

ASD restricts administrative privileges to operating systems and applications based on user duties.

Grounded in ASD37-18 Restrict administrative privileges (Essential). Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: NIST800-AC-1 Access control policy and procedures

Requires an access control policy and supporting procedures to be written, approved, issued to the personnel who must apply them, owned by a named official, and reviewed and reissued on a defined frequency and after defined trigger events,...

Every one of the 31 evidenced controls and 269 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 into ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents
86.5%

32 of 37 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. 5 are genuine gaps.

88.2%Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution
80%Limiting the Extent of Cyber Security Incidents
83.3%Detecting Cyber Security Incidents and Responding
100%Recovering Data and System Availability
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 58 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: ASD37-01 Application control (Essential)

Least functionality prohibits or restricts the software and functions not essential to the mission.

Grounded in NIST800-CM-7 Least functionality. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: ASD37-05 Automated dynamic analysis of email and web content (Excellent)

Automated dynamic analysis to detonate and analyse content run in a sandbox, e.g. by an email gateway or web proxy. Enrich analysis using reputation and other internet-sourced data.

Every one of the 32 evidenced controls and 5 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 100% in the header counts how many ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents has 37 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 covers 320 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 37 overlapping controls (100% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Limiting the Extent of Cyber Security Incidents, where 0 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 equivalent.

How many controls map between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

Of 37 total ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls, 37 map directly to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls, representing 100% coverage. The remaining 0 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

0 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. The highest concentration of gaps is in Limiting the Extent of Cyber Security Incidents with 0 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

The domain with the highest gap count is Limiting the Extent of Cyber Security Incidents (0 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.