ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security IncidentsvsNIST SP 800-171 Rev 3
See exactly how ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls map to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents maps to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 with 97% coverage across 36 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls identifies 1 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Recovering Data and System Availability.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 65 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution(20 mappings)
+45 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls your existing ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents into NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 lands at 24.7%, while NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 into ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents lands at 70.3%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents evidence buys you for NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3, the other asks the reverse.
24 of 97 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents. 73 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
ASD enforces access to operating systems and applications strictly according to user duties.
Grounded in ASD37-18 Restrict administrative privileges (Essential). Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Define, establish, modify, disable, and remove account types; assign managers; specify membership conditions; authorize access; monitor account use; notify managers on triggering events; require re-authorization at defined frequencies.
Every one of the 24 evidenced controls and 73 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
26 of 37 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3. 11 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Authorized software identified with a deny-all allow-by-exception execution policy.
Grounded in 03.04.08 Authorized Software - Allow by Exception. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Automated dynamic analysis to detonate and analyse content run in a sandbox, e.g. by an email gateway or web proxy. Enrich analysis using reputation and other internet-sourced data.
Every one of the 26 evidenced controls and 11 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 97% in the header counts how many ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3?
ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents has 37 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 covers 97 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 36 overlapping controls (97% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Recovering Data and System Availability, where 1 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 equivalent.
How many controls map between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3?
Of 37 total ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls, 36 map directly to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls, representing 97% coverage. The remaining 1 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3?
1 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3. The highest concentration of gaps is in Recovering Data and System Availability with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3?
The domain with the highest gap count is Recovering Data and System Availability (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.