TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management SystemvsEASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation

See exactly how AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System controls map to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
52
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System maps to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation with 10% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 69 AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System controls identifies 72 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 69 controls analysed | 769 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 769 frameworks.

Improvement(1 mappings)

AS9100D-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action
→IS.AR.210Findings and Corrective Actions

Improvement (Clause 10)(3 mappings)

AS9100D-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action
→IS.AR.210Findings and Corrective Actions
ISO27003-10.1Continual Improvement
→IS.AR.210Findings and Corrective Actions
ISO27003-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action
→IS.AR.210Findings and Corrective Actions

Operation (Clause 8)(8 mappings)

AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control3 targets
→IS.D.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
→IS.I.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
→IS.I.OR.220Information Security Risk Management
ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment2 targets
→IS.D.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
→IS.I.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
ISO27003-8.3Information Security Risk Treatment3 targets
→IS.D.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
→IS.I.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
→IS.I.OR.220Information Security Risk Management

Planning (Clause 6)(5 mappings)

ISO27003-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities5 targets
→IS.D.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
→IS.D.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
→IS.I.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
→IS.I.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
→IS.I.OR.220Information Security Risk Management

Related Comparisons

Other AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System comparisons

AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System vs AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence16 mappingsAS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System vs ISO/IEC 27003:201716 mappingsAS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System vs PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products16 mappingsAS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System vs SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food15 mappingsAS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System vs CIS Controls v814 mappingsAS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements14 mappingsAS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System vs ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence13 mappingsAS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System vs ISO 2700512 mappings

Other EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation9 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation9 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation9 mappingsC2M2 vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsIEEE 1686 vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsNIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsAPI 1164 vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsEU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 769 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 769 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System has 69 controls across its framework, while EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation covers 34 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation, where 12 AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System controls have no direct EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation equivalent.

How many controls map between AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

Of 69 total AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System controls, 8 map directly to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 72 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

72 AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System controls have no direct equivalent in EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.