Cross-Framework Mapping

US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity RequirementsvsFedRAMP Rev 5

See exactly how US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls map to FedRAMP Rev 5. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

30
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
43%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements maps to FedRAMP Rev 5 with 43% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls identifies 12 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Vessel and OCS Facility Requirements.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 30 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Facility Security Assessment and Planning(12 mappings)

33CFR105.305Facility Security Assessment4 targets
3.10Physical and Environmental Protection
FEDRAMP-PE-3Physical Access Control
FEDRAMP-PE-6Monitoring Physical Access
ICS-AC-4Physical access controls
33CFR105.400Facility Security Plan (FSP)4 targets
3.10Physical and Environmental Protection
FEDRAMP-PE-3Physical Access Control
FEDRAMP-PE-6Monitoring Physical Access
ICS-AC-4Physical access controls
33CFR105.405Format and Content of FSP4 targets
3.10Physical and Environmental Protection
FEDRAMP-PE-3Physical Access Control
FEDRAMP-PE-6Monitoring Physical Access
ICS-AC-4Physical access controls

Cybersecurity Officer and Personnel(3 mappings)

CSO-3Cybersecurity Drills and Exercises3 targets
FEDRAMP-IR-1Incident Response Policy
FEDRAMP-IR-6Incident Reporting
FEDRAMP-PE-6Monitoring Physical Access

Cybersecurity Plan Requirements(5 mappings)

CYB-2Account Security Measures4 targets
CJIS-5Identification and Authentication
FEDRAMP-PS-4Personnel Termination
ICS-AC-2Authentication mechanisms
NIS2-IA-12Multi-Factor Authentication
CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup

+10 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements comparisons

Other FedRAMP Rev 5 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements and FedRAMP Rev 5?

US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements has 21 controls across its framework, while FedRAMP Rev 5 covers 64 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (43% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Vessel and OCS Facility Requirements, where 3 US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls have no direct FedRAMP Rev 5 equivalent.

How many controls map between US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements and FedRAMP Rev 5?

Of 21 total US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls, 9 map directly to FedRAMP Rev 5 controls — representing 43% coverage. The remaining 12 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements to FedRAMP Rev 5?

12 US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in FedRAMP Rev 5. The highest concentration of gaps is in Vessel and OCS Facility Requirements with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements and FedRAMP Rev 5?

The domain with the highest gap count is Vessel and OCS Facility Requirements (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.