US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity RequirementsvsISO/IEC 27400:2022
See exactly how US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls map to ISO/IEC 27400:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements maps to ISO/IEC 27400:2022 with 50% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 4 US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls identifies 2 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Training.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 4 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Security Plan(2 mappings)
Cyber Assessment(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27400:2022 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements and ISO/IEC 27400:2022?
US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements has 4 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27400:2022 covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Training, where 1 US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27400:2022 equivalent.
How many controls map between US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements and ISO/IEC 27400:2022?
Of 4 total US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls, 2 map directly to ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements to ISO/IEC 27400:2022?
2 US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27400:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in Training with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements and ISO/IEC 27400:2022?
The domain with the highest gap count is Training (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.