Cross-Framework Mapping

US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity RequirementsvsIACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems

See exactly how US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls map to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
1
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements maps to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems with 50% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 4 US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls identifies 2 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Training.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 4 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Security Plan(1 mappings)

USMTSA-1Facility Security Assessment and Plan
IACS-UR-E26-Protect-RemoteAccess-Wireless-Physical-BoundaryIACS UR E26 Protect Goal - Remote Access + Wireless + Physical Security + Boundary Protection

Cyber Assessment(2 mappings)

USMTSA-2Cybersecurity Assessment and CSO Designation2 targets
IACS-UR-E26-Respond-Recover-IncidentResponse-Recovery-Backup-LessonsIACS UR E26 Respond + Recover Goals - Incident Response + Communication + Recovery + Backup + Lessons Learned
IACS-UR-E27-Logging-Forensics-EventCaptureIACS UR E27 - Equipment Logging + Forensic Readiness + Event Capture + Tamper Detection

Related Comparisons

Other US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements comparisons

Other IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements and IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?

US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements has 4 controls across its framework, while IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems covers 19 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Training, where 1 US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls have no direct IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems equivalent.

How many controls map between US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements and IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?

Of 4 total US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls, 2 map directly to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?

2 US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems. The highest concentration of gaps is in Training with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements and IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?

The domain with the highest gap count is Training (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.