TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience FrameworkvsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management

See exactly how UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework controls map to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
14
Gaps Found
48%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework maps to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management with 48% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 27 UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework controls identifies 14 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in PRA Rulebook Operational Resilience Parts (in force) – UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 27 controls analysed | 963 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 control mappings across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 963 frameworks.

Superseded batch representation – UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework(3 mappings)

UKOPRES-3Self-Assessment and Board Engagement
→CPS230-11Identification, Assessment and Management of Operational Risk
UKOPRES-5Third-Party Risk, Concentration Risk2 targets
→CPS230-27Identification and Escalation of Incidents and Near Misses
→CPS230-49Internal Audit Review of Proposed Critical Operation Outsourcing

Incident and third party reporting (made 2026, in force 18 March 2027) – UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework(4 mappings)

uk-fcapra-operational-resilience-framework::F-15.18Report operational incidents that meet the thresholds, in phases for enhanced reporting firms
→apra-cps-230-operational-risk-management::32Para 32 Notify APRA within 72 hours of a material operational risk incident
uk-fcapra-operational-resilience-framework::F-15.19Notify the FCA before entering into or significantly changing a material third party arrangement
→apra-cps-230-operational-risk-management::60Para 60 Notify APRA of critical-operation agreements (20 business days) and before material offshoring
uk-fcapra-operational-resilience-framework::F-16.33Maintain a register of material third party arrangements and submit it annually2 targets
→apra-cps-230-operational-risk-management::48Para 48 Register of material service providers and management of their risks
→apra-cps-230-operational-risk-management::50Para 50 Annual submission of the material service provider register to APRA

FCA SYSC 15A operational resilience (in force) – UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework(8 mappings)

uk-fcapra-operational-resilience-framework::F-2.1Identify important business services and review them at least yearly
→apra-cps-230-operational-risk-management::33Para 33 Business continuity duties: critical operations register, minimise disruption, credible BCP, activate, return
uk-fcapra-operational-resilience-framework::F-2.5Set an impact tolerance for each important business service and review it at least yearly
→apra-cps-230-operational-risk-management::37Para 37 Tolerance levels for each critical operation
uk-fcapra-operational-resilience-framework::F-2.9Be able to remain within impact tolerance in severe but plausible disruption (by 31 March 2025)
→apra-cps-230-operational-risk-management::13Para 13 Prevent disruption, adapt within tolerance and return to normal promptly
uk-fcapra-operational-resilience-framework::F-3.1Maintain sound, effective and comprehensive strategies, processes and systems for operational resilience
→apra-cps-230-operational-risk-management::11Para 11 Key principles: manage operational risk, keep critical operations within tolerance, manage service provider risk
uk-fcapra-operational-resilience-framework::F-4.1Map the people, processes, technology, facilities and information behind each service and keep it current
→apra-cps-230-operational-risk-management::26Para 26 Maintain a comprehensive operational risk profile assessment
uk-fcapra-operational-resilience-framework::F-5.3Scenario test against severe but plausible disruptions, regularly and after changes2 targets
→apra-cps-230-operational-risk-management::42Para 42 Systematic BCP testing program with an annual exercise
→apra-cps-230-operational-risk-management::43Para 43 Tailored test scenarios including material service provider disruption
uk-fcapra-operational-resilience-framework::F-5.8Run lessons learned after tests and real disruptions and make the improvements
→apra-cps-230-operational-risk-management::44Para 44 Annual BCP update

PRA Rulebook Operational Resilience Parts (in force) – UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework(1 mappings)

uk-fcapra-operational-resilience-framework::P-7.1Have the management body approve services, tolerances and the self-assessment
→apra-cps-230-operational-risk-management::21Para 21 Board oversight duties: risk profile, BCP and tolerances, service provider policy
Coverage crosswalk

A UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls your existing UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework into APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management into UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 48% in the header counts how many UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework comparisons

UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework vs South Korea ISMS-P3 mappingsUK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework vs Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)3 mappingsUK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework vs AICPA Privacy Management Framework (PMF)3 mappingsUK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework vs Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)3 mappingsUK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 53 mappingsUK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework vs SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)3 mappingsUK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework vs Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) - Responsible Minerals Assurance Process3 mappingsUK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework vs US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) - Higher Education Safeguards Rule2 mappings

Other APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management comparisons

DORA vs APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management52 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management46 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management43 mappingsISO 27002:2022 vs APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management41 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management40 mappingsFedRAMP High vs APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management40 mappingsFedRAMP Moderate vs APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management40 mappingsSOC 2 vs APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management38 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 963 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 963 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework and APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?

UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework has 27 controls across its framework, while APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management covers 87 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (48% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in PRA Rulebook Operational Resilience Parts (in force) – UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework, where 6 UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework controls have no direct APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management equivalent.

How many controls map between UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework and APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?

Of 27 total UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework controls, 13 map directly to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls, representing 48% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?

14 UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework controls have no direct equivalent in APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management. The highest concentration of gaps is in PRA Rulebook Operational Resilience Parts (in force) – UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework and APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?

The domain with the highest gap count is PRA Rulebook Operational Resilience Parts (in force) – UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.