TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience FrameworkvsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5

See exactly how UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework controls map to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
60%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework maps to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 with 60% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 5 UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework controls identifies 2 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Impact Tolerances.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 5 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Self-Assessment(3 mappings)

UKOPRES-3Self-Assessment and Board Engagement3 targets
→NIST800-RA-1Policy and procedures for risk assessment
→NIST800-RA-2Security categorization
→NIST800-RA-5Vulnerability monitoring and scanning

Incident(2 mappings)

UKOPRES-4Incident Management, Lessons Learned, Comms2 targets
→NIST800-CA-8Penetration testing
→NIST800-SI-2Flaw remediation

Third-Party(3 mappings)

UKOPRES-5Third-Party Risk, Concentration Risk3 targets
→NIST800-SR-11Component authenticity
→NIST800-SR-3Supply chain controls and processes
→NIST800-SR-8Notification agreements

Related Comparisons

Other UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework comparisons

UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework vs SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)3 mappingsUK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework vs NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)3 mappingsUK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework vs APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management3 mappingsUK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework vs AICPA Privacy Management Framework (PMF)3 mappingsUK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework vs Vermont Artificial Intelligence and Consumer Data Act (AICDA)2 mappingsUK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework vs API 11642 mappingsUK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework vs ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard2 mappingsUK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework vs ISO/IEC 27031:20112 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 comparisons

ISO 27001:2022 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5130 mappingsNIST SP 800-171 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 540 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 534 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 532 mappingsCMMC 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 532 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 - IT Security Risk Management vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 531 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 531 mappingsAPI 1164 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 531 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework has 5 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 covers 192 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (60% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Impact Tolerances, where 1 UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework controls have no direct NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 equivalent.

How many controls map between UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

Of 5 total UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework controls, 3 map directly to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls — representing 60% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

2 UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. The highest concentration of gaps is in Impact Tolerances with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

The domain with the highest gap count is Impact Tolerances (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.