Cross-Framework Mapping

DORAvsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management

See exactly how DORA controls map to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

49
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
62%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

DORA maps to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management with 62% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 26 DORA controls identifies 10 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in DORA Chapters VI-VII: Information Sharing, Penalties and Data Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 26 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 49 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

DORA Chapter II: ICT Risk Management(20 mappings)

DORA-Art.10Detection
CPS230-P40Required Content of the Business Continuity Plan
DORA-Art.11Response and recovery3 targets
CPS230-20Prevention, Adaptation and Return to Normal Operations
CPS230-26Critical Operations Register, Continuity Plan and Activation
CPS230-P40Required Content of the Business Continuity Plan
DORA-Art.12Backup policies and procedures, restoration and recovery2 targets
CPS230-19Tolerance Levels for Each Critical Operation
CPS230-26Critical Operations Register, Continuity Plan and Activation
DORA-Art.13Learning and evolving3 targets
CPS230-27Identification and Escalation of Incidents and Near Misses
CPS230-P31Remediation of Material Operational Risk Weaknesses
CPS230-P45Annual Update of the Business Continuity Plan
DORA-Art.5Governance and organisation5 targets
CPS230-13Board Accountability for Operational Risk Management
CPS230-14Board Setting of Senior Manager Roles and Responsibilities
CPS230-8Board Oversight, Approval of the BCP, Tolerance Levels and Service Provider Policy
CPS230-P23Senior Management Information to the Board on Resilience Decisions
CPS230-P41BCP Execution Capability and Tolerance Breach Reporting
DORA-Art.6ICT risk management framework6 targets
CPS230-15Operational Risk Elements of the Risk Management Framework
CPS230-16Internal Audit Review of the Business Continuity Plan
CPS230-49Internal Audit Review of Proposed Critical Operation Outsourcing
CPS230-66Review of Operational Risk Management
CPS230-9Management of the Full Range of Operational Risks
CPS230-P12Key Principles for Operational Risk, Resilience and Service Providers

+29 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The DORA to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls your existing DORA work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

DORA into APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management
62.8%

27 of 43 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls are evidenced by work you have already done for DORA. 16 are genuine gaps.

50%Operational Risk Management Framework
60%Service Provider Management
85.7%Business Continuity
75%Regulatory
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-20. 49 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: CPS 230 para 14 Prevention, Adaptation and Return to Normal Operations

Response and recovery plans must contain damage, sustain critical functions and resume normal activities.

Grounded in DORA-Art.11 Response and recovery. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: CPS 230 para 12 Key Principles for Operational Risk, Resilience and Service Providers

The entity must effectively manage its operational risks and set and maintain appropriate standards for conduct and compliance, hold its critical operations within tolerance levels through severe disruption, and manage the risks arising...

Every one of the 27 evidenced controls and 16 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management into DORA
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

DORA to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 62% in the header counts how many DORA controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between DORA and APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?

DORA has 26 controls across its framework, while APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management covers 43 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in DORA Chapters VI-VII: Information Sharing, Penalties and Data Protection, where 3 DORA controls have no direct APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management equivalent.

How many controls map between DORA and APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?

Of 26 total DORA controls, 16 map directly to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls, representing 62% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping DORA to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?

10 DORA controls have no direct equivalent in APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management. The highest concentration of gaps is in DORA Chapters VI-VII: Information Sharing, Penalties and Data Protection with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between DORA and APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?

The domain with the highest gap count is DORA Chapters VI-VII: Information Sharing, Penalties and Data Protection (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.