Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5vsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management

See exactly how NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls map to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

107
Controls Mapped
193
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 maps to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management with 18% coverage across 54 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 300 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls identifies 266 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in SC - System and Communications Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 300 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 107 mapped controls across 14 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

AU - Audit and Accountability(1 mappings)

NIST800-AU-6Audit record review, analysis, and reporting
CPS230-P30Monitoring, Review and Testing of Control Effectiveness

CA - Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring(14 mappings)

NIST800-CA-2Control assessments4 targets
CPS230-16Internal Audit Review of the Business Continuity Plan
CPS230-24Design and Embedding of Internal Controls
CPS230-49Internal Audit Review of Proposed Critical Operation Outsourcing
CPS230-P30Monitoring, Review and Testing of Control Effectiveness
NIST800-CA-5Plan of action and milestones
CPS230-P31Remediation of Material Operational Risk Weaknesses
NIST800-CA-6Authorization2 targets
CPS230-13Board Accountability for Operational Risk Management
CPS230-P28Risk Assessment Before Providing a Material Service to Another Party
NIST800-CA-7Continuous monitoring7 targets
CPS230-16Internal Audit Review of the Business Continuity Plan
CPS230-47Monitoring and Senior Management Reporting on Material Arrangements
CPS230-49Internal Audit Review of Proposed Critical Operation Outsourcing
CPS230-66Review of Operational Risk Management
CPS230-P23Senior Management Information to the Board on Resilience Decisions
CPS230-P27Comprehensive Assessment of the Operational Risk Profile
CPS230-P30Monitoring, Review and Testing of Control Effectiveness

CM - Configuration Management(2 mappings)

NIST800-CM-4Impact analyses
CPS230-P26Assessment of Business and Strategic Decisions on the Risk Profile
NIST800-CM-8System component inventory
CPS230-P25Information and Technology Capability and Asset Health

CP - Contingency Planning(3 mappings)

NIST800-CP-1Policy and procedures for contingency planning2 targets
CPS230-26Critical Operations Register, Continuity Plan and Activation
CPS230-8Board Oversight, Approval of the BCP, Tolerance Levels and Service Provider Policy
NIST800-CP-10System recovery and reconstitution
CPS230-19Tolerance Levels for Each Critical Operation

+87 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls your existing NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 into APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management lands at 58.1%, while APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management into NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 lands at 11%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 evidence buys you for APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management, the other asks the reverse.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 into APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management
58.1%

25 of 43 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. 18 are genuine gaps.

70%Service Provider Management
85.7%Business Continuity
41.7%Operational Risk Management Framework
75%Critical Operations
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 56 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: CPS 230 para 13 Identification, Assessment and Management of Operational Risk

Identifying threats and weaknesses, judging likelihood and harm, is operational risk assessment.

Grounded in NIST800-RA-3 Risk assessment. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: CPS 230 para 12 Key Principles for Operational Risk, Resilience and Service Providers

The entity must effectively manage its operational risks and set and maintain appropriate standards for conduct and compliance, hold its critical operations within tolerance levels through severe disruption, and manage the risks arising...

Every one of the 25 evidenced controls and 18 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management into NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5
11%

33 of 300 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management. 267 are genuine gaps.

25%PM - Program Management
50%SR - Supply Chain Risk Management
33.3%CP - Contingency Planning
44.4%IR - Incident Response
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 50 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: NIST800-CA-2 Control assessments

Controls must be monitored, reviewed and tested for design and operating effectiveness.

Grounded in CPS230-P30 Monitoring, Review and Testing of Control Effectiveness. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: NIST800-AC-1 Access control policy and procedures

Requires an access control policy and supporting procedures to be written, approved, issued to the personnel who must apply them, owned by a named official, and reviewed and reissued on a defined frequency and after defined trigger events,...

Every one of the 33 evidenced controls and 267 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 18% in the header counts how many NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 has 300 controls across its framework, while APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management covers 43 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 54 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SC - System and Communications Protection, where 46 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls have no direct APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?

Of 300 total NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls, 54 map directly to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls, representing 18% coverage. The remaining 266 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?

266 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls have no direct equivalent in APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management. The highest concentration of gaps is in SC - System and Communications Protection with 46 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?

The domain with the highest gap count is SC - System and Communications Protection (46 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.