Cross-Framework Mapping

SOC 2vsCIS Controls v8

See exactly how SOC 2 controls map to CIS Controls v8. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

484
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
72%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which CIS Controls v8 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SOC 2 maps to CIS Controls v8 with 72% coverage across 44 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 61 SOC 2 controls identifies 19 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in P - Privacy.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 61 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 484 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.

A - Availability(11 mappings)

SOC2-A1.1A1.1 Managing processing capacity2 targets
→CIS-12.2Establish and Maintain a Secure Network Architecture
→CIS-8.3Ensure Adequate Audit Log Storage
SOC2-A1.2A1.2 Environmental protection, backup and recovery infrastructure5 targets
→CIS-11.1Establish and Maintain a Data Recovery Process
→CIS-11.2Perform Automated Backups
→CIS-11.3Protect Recovery Data
→CIS-11.4Establish and Maintain an Isolated Instance of Recovery Data
→CIS-11.5Test Data Recovery
SOC2-A1.3A1.3 Testing recovery plan procedures4 targets
→CIS-11.1Establish and Maintain a Data Recovery Process
→CIS-11.4Establish and Maintain an Isolated Instance of Recovery Data
→CIS-11.5Test Data Recovery
→CIS-17.7Conduct Routine Incident Response Exercises

C - Confidentiality(9 mappings)

SOC2-C1.1C1.1 Identifying and maintaining confidential information9 targets
→CIS-1.1Establish and Maintain Detailed Enterprise Asset Inventory
→CIS-11.3Protect Recovery Data
→CIS-14.4Train Workforce on Data Handling Best Practices
→CIS-14.5Train Workforce Members on Causes of Unintentional Data Exposure
→CIS-3.1Establish and Maintain a Data Management Process
→CIS-3.10Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit
→CIS-3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest
→CIS-3.12Segment Data Processing and Storage Based on Sensitivity
→CIS-3.13Deploy a Data Loss Prevention Solution

+464 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 868 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The SOC 2 to CIS Controls v8 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which CIS Controls v8 controls your existing SOC 2 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. SOC 2 into CIS Controls v8 lands at 26.1%, while CIS Controls v8 into SOC 2 lands at 37.7%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your SOC 2 evidence buys you for CIS Controls v8, the other asks the reverse.

SOC 2 into CIS Controls v8
26.1%

40 of 153 CIS Controls v8 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for SOC 2. 113 are genuine gaps.

CIS Controls v8 into SOC 2
37.7%

23 of 61 SOC 2 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for CIS Controls v8. 38 are genuine gaps.

SOC 2 to CIS Controls v8
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 72% in the header counts how many SOC 2 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many CIS Controls v8 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 868 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between SOC 2 and CIS Controls v8?

SOC 2 has 61 controls across its framework, while CIS Controls v8 covers 153 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 44 overlapping controls (72% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in P - Privacy, where 9 SOC 2 controls have no direct CIS Controls v8 equivalent.

How many controls map between SOC 2 and CIS Controls v8?

Of 61 total SOC 2 controls, 44 map directly to CIS Controls v8 controls, representing 72% coverage. The remaining 19 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SOC 2 to CIS Controls v8?

19 SOC 2 controls have no direct equivalent in CIS Controls v8. The highest concentration of gaps is in P - Privacy with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SOC 2 and CIS Controls v8?

The domain with the highest gap count is P - Privacy (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.