SOC 2vsCIS Controls v8
See exactly how SOC 2 controls map to CIS Controls v8. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which CIS Controls v8 controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
SOC 2 maps to CIS Controls v8 with 70% coverage across 44 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 61 SOC 2 controls identifies 17 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in P - Privacy.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 61 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 484 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
A - Availability(11 mappings)
C - Confidentiality(9 mappings)
+464 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The SOC 2 to CIS Controls v8 crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which CIS Controls v8 controls your existing SOC 2 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. SOC 2 into CIS Controls v8 lands at 26.1%, while CIS Controls v8 into SOC 2 lands at 37.7%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your SOC 2 evidence buys you for CIS Controls v8, the other asks the reverse.
40 of 153 CIS Controls v8 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for SOC 2. 113 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Controls to prevent or detect and act upon malicious software are deployed and maintained.
Grounded in SOC2-CC6.8 Controls to prevent or detect unauthorized or malicious software. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Establish and maintain an accurate, detailed, and up-to-date inventory of all enterprise assets with the potential to store or process data, to include: end-user devices (including portable and mobile), network devices, non-computing/IoT...
Every one of the 40 evidenced controls and 113 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
23 of 61 SOC 2 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for CIS Controls v8. 38 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
An isolated recovery instance is the recovery infrastructure the criterion names.
Grounded in CIS-11.4 Establish and Maintain an Isolated Instance of Recovery Data. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Maintains, monitors, and evaluates current processing capacity and use of system components (infrastructure, data, and software) to manage capacity demand and to enable the implementation of additional capacity to help meet its objectives
Every one of the 23 evidenced controls and 38 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 70% in the header counts how many SOC 2 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many CIS Controls v8 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other SOC 2 comparisons
Other CIS Controls v8 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between SOC 2 and CIS Controls v8?
SOC 2 has 61 controls across its framework, while CIS Controls v8 covers 153 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 44 overlapping controls (70% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in P - Privacy, where 9 SOC 2 controls have no direct CIS Controls v8 equivalent.
How many controls map between SOC 2 and CIS Controls v8?
Of 61 total SOC 2 controls, 44 map directly to CIS Controls v8 controls, representing 70% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping SOC 2 to CIS Controls v8?
17 SOC 2 controls have no direct equivalent in CIS Controls v8. The highest concentration of gaps is in P - Privacy with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between SOC 2 and CIS Controls v8?
The domain with the highest gap count is P - Privacy (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.