TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)vsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
16
Gaps Found
26%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 26% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) controls identifies 26 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in SOCI Act: Sector Coverage.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

SOCI Act: Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program(14 mappings)

SOCI-CIRMP-PERSONNELCIRMP hazard vector: Personnel
→3.9Encrypt Data on Removable Media
SOCI-CIRMP-PHYSICALCIRMP hazard vector: Physical security and natural hazards3 targets
→3.10Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit
→3.6Encrypt Data on End-User Devices
→3.6.1Procedures are defined and implemented to protect cryptographic keys used to protect stored account data against disclosure and misuse that include: • Access to keys is restricted to the fewest number of custodians necessary.
SOCI-CIRMP-SUPPLYCIRMP hazard vector: Supply chain4 targets
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
→3.5Securely Dispose of Data
→3.7.1Key-management policies and procedures are implemented to include generation of strong cryptographic keys used to protect stored account data
SOCI-S30ACObligation to adopt a CIRMP2 targets
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
SOCI-S30ADCompliance with CIRMP2 targets
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
SOCI-S30AEAnnual review of CIRMP2 targets
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management

SOCI Act: Enhanced Cyber Security Obligations(3 mappings)

SOCI-S30CBStatutory incident response planning2 targets
→3.6Encrypt Data on End-User Devices
→3.6.1Procedures are defined and implemented to protect cryptographic keys used to protect stored account data against disclosure and misuse that include: • Access to keys is restricted to the fewest number of custodians necessary.
SOCI-S30CUVulnerability assessments
→3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest

SOCI Act: Government Assistance Powers(2 mappings)

SOCI-S35ABMinisterial authorisation for government assistance2 targets
→3.6Encrypt Data on End-User Devices
→3.6.1Procedures are defined and implemented to protect cryptographic keys used to protect stored account data against disclosure and misuse that include: • Access to keys is restricted to the fewest number of custodians necessary.
Coverage crosswalk

A Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls your existing Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) into NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements into Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 26% in the header counts how many Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) comparisons

Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 510 mappingsSecurity of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)10 mappingsSecurity of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.010 mappingsSecurity of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) vs Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)10 mappingsSecurity of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) vs SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)10 mappingsSecurity of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) vs SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination9 mappingsSecurity of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) vs FFIEC IT Examination Handbook8 mappingsSecurity of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) vs API 11648 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements18 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements17 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements16 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 686 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) has 35 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (26% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SOCI Act: Sector Coverage, where 11 Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 35 total Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) controls, 9 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, representing 26% coverage. The remaining 26 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

26 Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in SOCI Act: Sector Coverage with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is SOCI Act: Sector Coverage (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.