Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)vsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)
See exactly how Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) controls map to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) maps to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) with 20% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 50 Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) controls identifies 40 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Critical Infrastructure Sectors.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 50 controls analysed | 704 frameworks | 359K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 359K+ mappings across 704 frameworks.
Part 2A - Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP)(8 mappings)
Part 2B - Notification of Cyber Security Incidents(2 mappings)
Part 2C - Enhanced Cyber Security Obligations (Systems of National Significance)(2 mappings)
Part 3A - Government Assistance (Last Resort Powers)(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) comparisons
Other FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 704 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 704 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (359K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?
Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) has 50 controls across its framework, while FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Critical Infrastructure Sectors, where 11 Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) controls have no direct FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) equivalent.
How many controls map between Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?
Of 50 total Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) controls, 10 map directly to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls — representing 20% coverage. The remaining 40 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?
40 Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) controls have no direct equivalent in FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT). The highest concentration of gaps is in Critical Infrastructure Sectors with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Critical Infrastructure Sectors (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.