TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)vsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

See exactly how Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

31
Controls Mapped
19
Gaps Found
20%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 20% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 50 Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) controls identifies 40 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Critical Infrastructure Sectors.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 50 controls analysed | 716 frameworks | 430K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 31 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 430K+ mappings across 716 frameworks.

Part 2A - Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP)(17 mappings)

SOCI-CIRMP-PHYSICALCIRMP hazard vector: Physical security and natural hazards4 targets
→NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans are established and maintained
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-06Physical access to assets is managed, monitored, and enforced
→NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed
→NIST-CSF-RS.MA-01The incident response plan is executed in coordination with relevant third parties
SOCI-CIRMP-SUPPLYCIRMP hazard vector: Supply chain4 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established
→NIST-CSF-ID.AM-04Inventories of services provided by suppliers are maintained
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-10Critical suppliers are assessed on the basis of their risk
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed
SOCI-S30ACObligation to adopt a CIRMP3 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established
SOCI-S30ADCompliance with CIRMP3 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established
SOCI-S30AEAnnual review of CIRMP3 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established

Part 2B - Notification of Cyber Security Incidents(3 mappings)

SOCI-S30BCNotification of critical cyber security incidents (12 hours)3 targets
→NIST-CSF-PR.DS-10The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-in-use are protected
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-03Mechanisms are implemented to achieve resilience requirements in normal and adverse situations
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-04Adequate resource capacity to ensure availability is maintained

+11 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 716 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) comparisons

Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) vs TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange12 mappingsSecurity of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) vs Telecommunications Sector Security Reforms (TSSR)12 mappingsSecurity of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 202412 mappingsSecurity of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)11 mappingsSecurity of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 510 mappingsSecurity of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) vs GLI-33 - Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems10 mappingsSecurity of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)10 mappingsSecurity of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security10 mappings

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

ISO 27001:2022 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.082 mappingsBelgium CyberFundamentals vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.032 mappingsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.032 mappingsASEAN Data Management Framework vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.025 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.020 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.020 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 716 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 716 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (430K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) has 50 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Critical Infrastructure Sectors, where 11 Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 50 total Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) controls, 10 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls — representing 20% coverage. The remaining 40 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

40 Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Critical Infrastructure Sectors with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Critical Infrastructure Sectors (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.