Cross-Framework Mapping

OWASP Top 10:2025vsMITRE ATT&CK

Name: OWASP Top 10:2025 to MITRE ATT&CK Control Mapping Dataset
Creator: TheArtOfService

See exactly how OWASP Top 10:2025 controls map to MITRE ATT&CK. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

Controls Mapped

Gaps Found

42%

Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OWASP Top 10:2025 maps to MITRE ATT&CK with 42% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in SSRF.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Access Control(3 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-1A01:2025 Broken Access Control3 targets

→MITRE-ATTACK-Matrices-Enterprise-Mobile-ICS-Cloud-AWS-Azure-Google-Office-365-Container-Platform-SpecificMITRE ATT&CK Matrices + Enterprise + Mobile + ICS + Cloud + AWS + Azure + Google + Office 365 + Container

→MITRE-ATTACK-Scope-Adversarial-Tactics-Techniques-MITRE-Corporation-2013-v15-v16-Enterprise-Mobile-ICS-CloudMITRE ATT&CK Scope + MITRE Corporation 2013 + v15 + v16 + Enterprise + Mobile + ICS + Cloud + Container

→MITRE-ATTACK-Techniques-Sub-Techniques-200-600-T1078-T1059-T1566-T1190-T1486-Procedures-Adversary-BehaviourMITRE ATT&CK Techniques + 200+ + Sub-Techniques + 600+ + T1078 + T1059 + T1566 + T1190 + T1486 + Procedures

Cryptography(2 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-2A02:2025 Cryptographic Failures and Secret Management2 targets

→MITRE-ATTACK-Mitigations-M-IDs-Active-Directory-User-Account-Management-Password-Policies-Network-SegmentationMITRE ATT&CK Mitigations + M-IDs + Active Directory + User Account + Password + Network Segmentation + Application Control

Secure Design(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-4A04:2025 Insecure Design and Business Logic (incl. A11 API Abuse)

Component Security(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-6A06:2025 Vulnerable and Outdated Components

Authentication(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-7A07:2025 Identification and Authentication Failures

Logging and Monitoring(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-9A09:2025 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures

→MITRE-ATTACK-Detection-Data-Sources-Analytics-Sigma-Splunk-KQL-Yara-Snort-SIEM-Hunt-EngineeringMITRE ATT&CK Detection + Data Sources + Analytics + Sigma + Splunk + KQL + Yara + Snort + SIEM + Hunt

Related Comparisons

Other OWASP Top 10:2025 comparisons

Other MITRE ATT&CK comparisons

OWASP MASVS vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappings OWASP ASVS vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappings MITRE D3FEND vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappings NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappings ISO 27043 vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappings ISO/SAE 21434 vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappings CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappings ISO 13485 vs MITRE ATT&CK5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

✓ 700 framework browser
✓ Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
✓ 824 compliance assessments
✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day

Get Started Free

Recommended

$49/month

Professional

✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
✓ Unlimited full-text search
✓ Framework self-assessment
✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports

Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53 ISO 27001 vs NIST CSF CMMC vs NIST 800-53 FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53 NIST CSF vs SOC 2 HIPAA vs NIST 800-53 ISO 27001 vs SOC 2 ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between OWASP Top 10:2025 and MITRE ATT&CK?

OWASP Top 10:2025 has 19 controls across its framework, while MITRE ATT&CK covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (42% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SSRF, where 1 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct MITRE ATT&CK equivalent.

How many controls map between OWASP Top 10:2025 and MITRE ATT&CK?

Of 19 total OWASP Top 10:2025 controls, 6 map directly to MITRE ATT&CK controls — representing 42% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP Top 10:2025 to MITRE ATT&CK?

4 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct equivalent in MITRE ATT&CK. The highest concentration of gaps is in SSRF with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP Top 10:2025 and MITRE ATT&CK?

The domain with the highest gap count is SSRF (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.