Cross-Framework Mapping

South Korea ISMS-PvsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)

See exactly how South Korea ISMS-P controls map to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

27
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
65%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

South Korea ISMS-P maps to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) with 65% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 20 South Korea ISMS-P controls identifies 7 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Personal Information Processing.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 20 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 27 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Protection Measures — Access Control and Authentication(4 mappings)

ISMSP-AC-01Access Control Policy
CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management
ISMSP-AC-03Authentication Mechanisms
CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management
ISMSP-AC-04Network Access Control2 targets
CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management
CSA-INF-02Infrastructure and Virtualization Security

Management System Requirements(3 mappings)

ISMSP-MS-02Risk Management3 targets
AESCSF-TVM-1Vulnerability Assessment
AESCSF-TVM-2Threat Intelligence
CSA-DATA-04Privacy by Design

Personal Information Processing(5 mappings)

ISMSP-PI-01Personal Information Collection
CSA-DATA-04Privacy by Design
ISMSP-PI-04Cross-Border Transfer
CSA-DATA-04Privacy by Design
ISMSP-PI-06Personal Information Destruction3 targets
CSA-DATA-03Data Retention and Deletion
CSA-INF-04Incident Management
CSA-INF-05Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery

Protection Measures — System and Data Security(8 mappings)

ISMSP-SYS-01System Hardening and Patch Management2 targets
AESCSF-TVM-3Patch Management
CSA-TVM-01Vulnerability Management
ISMSP-SYS-02Encryption Implementation2 targets
CSA-DATA-02Encryption and Key Management
CSA-DATA-04Privacy by Design
ISMSP-SYS-03Security Monitoring and Log Management
CSA-INF-03Security Monitoring and Logging
ISMSP-SYS-04Vulnerability Management3 targets
AESCSF-TVM-1Vulnerability Assessment
CSA-DATA-04Privacy by Design
CSA-INF-04Incident Management

+7 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between South Korea ISMS-P and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

South Korea ISMS-P has 20 controls across its framework, while CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) covers 15 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (65% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Personal Information Processing, where 3 South Korea ISMS-P controls have no direct CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) equivalent.

How many controls map between South Korea ISMS-P and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

Of 20 total South Korea ISMS-P controls, 13 map directly to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls — representing 65% coverage. The remaining 7 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping South Korea ISMS-P to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

7 South Korea ISMS-P controls have no direct equivalent in CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk). The highest concentration of gaps is in Personal Information Processing with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between South Korea ISMS-P and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Personal Information Processing (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.