Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) SecurityvsISO 22320:2018

See exactly how NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security controls map to ISO 22320:2018. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security maps to ISO 22320:2018 with 25% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in OT Supply Chain, Lifecycle, Physical.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

OT Security Program Governance(4 mappings)

NISTSP82-1OT Security Program Governance, Policy, Roles, and Safety-Security Integration4 targets
ISO-22320-4.3Risk-based approach
ISO-22320-5.1General process requirements
ISO-22320-5.3Incident management structure (command)
ISO-22320-5.4Roles and responsibilities

OT Incident Response and Recovery(6 mappings)

NISTSP82-7OT Incident Response, Forensics, Recovery, and Continuity6 targets
ISO-22320-5.1General process requirements
ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process
ISO-22320-5.3Incident management structure (command)
ISO-22320-5.4Roles and responsibilities
ISO-22320-BAnnex B: Incident management plan structure
ISO-22320-CAnnex C: Incident management task examples

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 706 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security and ISO 22320:2018?

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO 22320:2018 covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in OT Supply Chain, Lifecycle, Physical, where 1 NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security controls have no direct ISO 22320:2018 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security and ISO 22320:2018?

Of 8 total NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security controls, 2 map directly to ISO 22320:2018 controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security to ISO 22320:2018?

6 NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 22320:2018. The highest concentration of gaps is in OT Supply Chain, Lifecycle, Physical with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security and ISO 22320:2018?

The domain with the highest gap count is OT Supply Chain, Lifecycle, Physical (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.