Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) SecurityvsOWASP ASVS

See exactly how NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security controls map to OWASP ASVS. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
75%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security maps to OWASP ASVS with 75% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security controls identifies 2 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in OT Supply Chain, Lifecycle, Physical.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

OT Security Program Governance(1 mappings)

NISTSP82-1OT Security Program Governance, Policy, Roles, and Safety-Security Integration
OWASPASVS-1Architecture, Design and Threat Modelling (V1)

OT Risk Assessment(3 mappings)

NISTSP82-2OT Risk Assessment and Threat/Vulnerability Identification3 targets
OWASPASVS-2Authentication and Credential Storage (V2 + V2.4)
OWASPASVS-6Stored Cryptography (V6)
OWASPASVS-9Communication Security (V9)

OT Access Control and IAM(2 mappings)

NISTSP82-4OT Access Control, Identity, Authentication, and Remote Access2 targets
OWASPASVS-2Authentication and Credential Storage (V2 + V2.4)
OWASPASVS-4Access Control (V4 + V4.3)

OT Config, Patch, Vulnerability, Malware(1 mappings)

NISTSP82-5OT Configuration Management, Patching, Vulnerability Management, and Malware Protection
OWASPASVS-10Malicious Code Verification (V10)

OT Audit, Monitoring, Anomaly Detection(1 mappings)

NISTSP82-6OT Audit, Monitoring, Anomaly Detection, and OT-Specific SOC
OWASPASVS-7Error Handling and Logging (V7)

OT Incident Response and Recovery(2 mappings)

NISTSP82-7OT Incident Response, Forensics, Recovery, and Continuity2 targets
OWASPASVS-1Architecture, Design and Threat Modelling (V1)
OWASPASVS-8Data Protection (V8 + V8.3)

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security and OWASP ASVS?

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security has 8 controls across its framework, while OWASP ASVS covers 14 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (75% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in OT Supply Chain, Lifecycle, Physical, where 1 NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security controls have no direct OWASP ASVS equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security and OWASP ASVS?

Of 8 total NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security controls, 6 map directly to OWASP ASVS controls — representing 75% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security to OWASP ASVS?

2 NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security controls have no direct equivalent in OWASP ASVS. The highest concentration of gaps is in OT Supply Chain, Lifecycle, Physical with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security and OWASP ASVS?

The domain with the highest gap count is OT Supply Chain, Lifecycle, Physical (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.