TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Open Banking SecurityvsISO 22320:2018

See exactly how Open Banking Security controls map to ISO 22320:2018. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Open Banking Security maps to ISO 22320:2018 with 50% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Open Banking Security controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Fraud + TRA + Rate Limiting + Sandbox.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

SCA + Consent + UX(3 mappings)

OPENBANK-2Strong Customer Authentication (SCA), Consent Lifecycle, and Customer UX3 targets
→ISO-22320-5.1General process requirements
→ISO-22320-5.3Incident management structure (command)
→ISO-22320-5.4Roles and responsibilities

TPP Onboarding(1 mappings)

OPENBANK-4Third Party Provider (TPP) Onboarding, Directory Integration, Due Diligence
→ISO-22320-4.3Risk-based approach

Logging + Reporting + SLA(3 mappings)

OPENBANK-7Logging, Monitoring, Regulatory Reporting, SLA, Availability3 targets
→ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process
→ISO-22320-BAnnex B: Incident management plan structure
→ISO-22320-CAnnex C: Incident management task examples

Incident + BCM(3 mappings)

OPENBANK-8Incident Detection, Response, Customer Notification, Post-Incident Review, BCM3 targets
→ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process
→ISO-22320-BAnnex B: Incident management plan structure
→ISO-22320-CAnnex C: Incident management task examples

Related Comparisons

Other Open Banking Security comparisons

Open Banking Security vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.05 mappingsOpen Banking Security vs APRA CPS 2345 mappingsOpen Banking Security vs FFIEC IT Examination Handbook5 mappingsOpen Banking Security vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements5 mappingsOpen Banking Security vs Annex 11 to EU GMP - Computerised Systems5 mappingsOpen Banking Security vs NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)5 mappingsOpen Banking Security vs ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management5 mappingsOpen Banking Security vs ISO 270194 mappings

Other ISO 22320:2018 comparisons

PSD2 SCA vs ISO 22320:20187 mappingsOSFI B-13 vs ISO 22320:20187 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs ISO 22320:20187 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs ISO 22320:20187 mappingsMonetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines vs ISO 22320:20187 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs ISO 22320:20187 mappingsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs ISO 22320:20187 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ISO 22320:20187 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Open Banking Security and ISO 22320:2018?

Open Banking Security has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO 22320:2018 covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Fraud + TRA + Rate Limiting + Sandbox, where 1 Open Banking Security controls have no direct ISO 22320:2018 equivalent.

How many controls map between Open Banking Security and ISO 22320:2018?

Of 8 total Open Banking Security controls, 4 map directly to ISO 22320:2018 controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Open Banking Security to ISO 22320:2018?

4 Open Banking Security controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 22320:2018. The highest concentration of gaps is in Fraud + TRA + Rate Limiting + Sandbox with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Open Banking Security and ISO 22320:2018?

The domain with the highest gap count is Fraud + TRA + Rate Limiting + Sandbox (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.