Cross-Framework Mapping

Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)vsISO 22320:2018

See exactly how Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) controls map to ISO 22320:2018. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
19
Gaps Found
21%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) maps to ISO 22320:2018 with 21% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 33 Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) controls identifies 26 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Governance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 33 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Governance(5 mappings)

AASB-S2-6bManagement's Role in Governance
ISO-22320-4.3Risk-based approach
IM8-GOV.2Roles and Responsibilities3 targets
ISO-22320-5.1General process requirements
ISO-22320-5.3Incident management structure (command)
ISO-22320-5.4Roles and responsibilities
IM8-GOV.4ICT Security Risk Management
ISO-22320-4.3Risk-based approach

Resilience(8 mappings)

IM8-RES.2Disaster Recovery4 targets
ISO-22320-5.1General process requirements
ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process
ISO-22320-5.3Incident management structure (command)
ISO-22320-5.4Roles and responsibilities
IM8-RES.3Incident Response3 targets
ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process
ISO-22320-BAnnex B: Incident management plan structure
ISO-22320-CAnnex C: Incident management task examples
IM8-RES.4Resilience Testing
ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process

Third-Party Management(1 mappings)

IM8-TPM.4Supply Chain Risk Management
ISO-22320-4.3Risk-based approach

Related Comparisons

Other Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) comparisons

Other ISO 22320:2018 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) and ISO 22320:2018?

Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) has 33 controls across its framework, while ISO 22320:2018 covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Governance, where 7 Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) controls have no direct ISO 22320:2018 equivalent.

How many controls map between Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) and ISO 22320:2018?

Of 33 total Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) controls, 7 map directly to ISO 22320:2018 controls — representing 21% coverage. The remaining 26 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) to ISO 22320:2018?

26 Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 22320:2018. The highest concentration of gaps is in Governance with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) and ISO 22320:2018?

The domain with the highest gap count is Governance (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.