Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2vsSOC 2

See exactly how NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 controls map to SOC 2. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

207
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
85%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 maps to SOC 2 with 85% coverage across 55 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 65 NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 controls identifies 10 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Administrative.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 65 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 207 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.

Administrative(20 mappings)

164.308(a)(1)(i)Security Management Process (Standard)7 targets
→SOC2-CC3.1CC3.1 Objectives specified clearly enough to assess risk (COSO principle 6)
→SOC2-CC3.2CC3.2 Identifying and analysing risks to objectives (COSO principle 7)
→SOC2-CC4.1CC4.1 Ongoing and separate evaluations of control (COSO principle 16)
→SOC2-CC5.1CC5.1 Selecting control activities that mitigate risk (COSO principle 10)
→SOC2-CC5.3CC5.3 Deploying controls through policies and procedures (COSO principle 12)
→SOC2-CC7.1CC7.1 Detecting configuration changes and new vulnerabilities
→SOC2-CC7.4CC7.4 Responding to security incidents
164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A)Risk Analysis (Required)8 targets
→SOC2-C1.1C1.1 Identifying and maintaining confidential information
→SOC2-CC2.1CC2.1 Relevant, quality information to support internal control (COSO principle 13)
→SOC2-CC3.2CC3.2 Identifying and analysing risks to objectives (COSO principle 7)
→SOC2-CC3.4CC3.4 Identifying and assessing significant changes (COSO principle 9)
→SOC2-CC5.2CC5.2 General controls over technology (COSO principle 11)
→SOC2-CC6.6CC6.6 Protection against threats from outside the system boundary
→SOC2-CC6.8CC6.8 Preventing and detecting unauthorised or malicious software
→SOC2-PI1.1PI1.1 Quality information about processing objectives, data definitions and specifications
164.308(a)(1)(ii)(B)Risk Management (Required)5 targets
→SOC2-CC3.2CC3.2 Identifying and analysing risks to objectives (COSO principle 7)
→SOC2-CC4.2CC4.2 Evaluating and communicating control deficiencies (COSO principle 17)
→SOC2-CC5.1CC5.1 Selecting control activities that mitigate risk (COSO principle 10)
→SOC2-CC7.1CC7.1 Detecting configuration changes and new vulnerabilities
→SOC2-CC9.1CC9.1 Mitigating risks of business disruption

+187 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 868 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

A NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 to SOC 2 crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which SOC 2 controls your existing NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 into SOC 2
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

SOC 2 into NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 to SOC 2 (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 85% in the header counts how many NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many SOC 2 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 868 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 and SOC 2?

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 has 65 controls across its framework, while SOC 2 covers 61 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 55 overlapping controls (85% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Administrative, where 8 NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 controls have no direct SOC 2 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 and SOC 2?

Of 65 total NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 controls, 55 map directly to SOC 2 controls, representing 85% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 to SOC 2?

10 NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 controls have no direct equivalent in SOC 2. The highest concentration of gaps is in Administrative with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 and SOC 2?

The domain with the highest gap count is Administrative (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.