Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2vsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5

Name: NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 Control Mapping Dataset
Creator: TheArtOfService

See exactly how NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 controls map to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

271

Controls Mapped

Gaps Found

85%

Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 maps to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 with 85% coverage across 55 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 65 NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 controls identifies 10 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Administrative.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 65 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 271 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Administrative(20 mappings)

164.308(a)(1)(i)Security Management Process (Standard)5 targets

→NIST800-CA-7Continuous monitoring

→NIST800-IR-4Incident handling

→NIST800-PM-1Information Security Program Plan. Develop and disseminate an organization-wide information security program plan that: Provides an overview of the requirements for the security program and a description of the security program management controls and

→NIST800-RA-1Policy and procedures for risk assessment

→NIST800-RA-3Risk assessment

164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A)Risk Analysis (Required)15 targets

→NIST800-AC-23Data Mining Protection. Employ [organization-defined] for [organization-defined] to detect and protect against unauthorized data mining

→NIST800-CA-7Continuous monitoring

→NIST800-PE-18Location of System Components. Position system components within the facility to minimize potential damage from [organization-defined] and to minimize the opportunity for unauthorized access

→NIST800-PE-23Facility Location. Plan the location or site of the facility where the system resides considering physical and environmental hazards; and For existing facilities, consider the physical and environmental hazards in the organizational risk management

→NIST800-PM-28Risk Framing. Identify and document: Assumptions affecting risk assessments, risk responses, and risk monitoring; Constraints affecting risk assessments, risk responses, and risk monitoring; Priorities and trade-offs considered by the organization for managing risk; and

→NIST800-PM-30Supply Chain Risk Management Strategy. Develop an organization-wide strategy for managing supply chain risks associated with the development, acquisition, maintenance, and disposal of systems, system components, and system services; Implement the supply chain risk

→NIST800-RA-1Policy and procedures for risk assessment

→NIST800-RA-3Risk assessment

→NIST800-RA-5Vulnerability monitoring and scanning

→NIST800-SA-17Developer Security and Privacy Architecture and Design. Require the developer of the system, system component, or system service to produce a design specification and security and privacy architecture that: Is consistent with the organization's

→NIST800-SA-8Security and privacy engineering principles

→NIST800-SC-18Mobile Code. Define acceptable and unacceptable mobile code and mobile code technologies; and Authorize, monitor, and control the use of mobile code within the system

→NIST800-SC-31Covert Channel Analysis. Perform a covert channel analysis to identify those aspects of communications within the system that are potential avenues for covert [organization-defined] channels; and Estimate the maximum bandwidth of those channels

→NIST800-SC-38Operations Security. Employ the following operations security controls to protect key organizational information throughout the system development life cycle: [organization-defined]

→NIST800-SI-18Personally Identifiable Information Quality Operations. Check the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and completeness of personally identifiable information across the information life cycle [organization-defined] ; and Correct or delete inaccurate or outdated personally identifiable information

+251 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

A NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls your existing NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 into NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5

Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 into NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2

Not published yet

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 (built to order)

$299

per framework pair, one time

Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
Every gap, with what it requires
Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 85% in the header counts how many NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 comparisons

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 vs SOC 255 mappings NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 vs ISO 27001:202255 mappings NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 vs ISO 27002:202255 mappings NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 vs FedRAMP Moderate55 mappings NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 vs FedRAMP High55 mappings NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.054 mappings NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE54 mappings NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 vs NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH54 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 comparisons

SOC 2 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5266 mappings ISO 27002:2022 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5262 mappings ISO 27001:2022 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5253 mappings NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5237 mappings Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5208 mappings FedRAMP High vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5206 mappings FedRAMP Moderate vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5206 mappings PCI DSS 4.0 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5205 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

✓ 686 framework browser
✓ Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
✓ 824 compliance assessments
✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day

Get Started Free

Recommended

$149/month

Professional

✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
✓ Unlimited full-text search
✓ Framework self-assessment
✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports

Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53 ISO 27001 vs NIST CSF CMMC vs NIST 800-53 FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53 NIST CSF vs SOC 2 HIPAA vs NIST 800-53 ISO 27001 vs SOC 2 ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 has 65 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 covers 300 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 55 overlapping controls (85% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Administrative, where 8 NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

Of 65 total NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 controls, 55 map directly to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls, representing 85% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

10 NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. The highest concentration of gaps is in Administrative with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

The domain with the highest gap count is Administrative (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.