Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2vsFedRAMP High

Name: NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 to FedRAMP High Control Mapping Dataset
Creator: TheArtOfService

See exactly how NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 controls map to FedRAMP High. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

159

Controls Mapped

Gaps Found

85%

Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 maps to FedRAMP High with 85% coverage across 55 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 65 NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 controls identifies 10 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Administrative.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 65 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 159 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Administrative(20 mappings)

164.308(a)(1)(i)Security Management Process (Standard)3 targets

→IR-4Incident Handling

→PL-1Policy and Procedures

→RA-1Policy and Procedures

164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A)Risk Analysis (Required)2 targets

→RA-3Risk Assessment

→RA-7Risk Response

164.308(a)(1)(ii)(B)Risk Management (Required)4 targets

→CA-5Plan of Action and Milestones

→CA-7Continuous Monitoring

→RA-3Risk Assessment

→SI-2Flaw Remediation

164.308(a)(1)(ii)(C)Sanction Policy (Required)

→PS-8Personnel Sanctions

164.308(a)(1)(ii)(D)Information System Activity Review (Required)6 targets

→AC-2(12)Account Monitoring for Atypical Usage

→AU-6Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting

→AU-6(1)Automated Process Integration

→AU-6(3)Correlate Audit Record Repositories

→SA-1Policy and Procedures

→SI-4System Monitoring

164.308(a)(2)Assigned Security Responsibility (Standard)2 targets

→PL-1Policy and Procedures

→PS-9Position Descriptions. Incorporate security and privacy roles and responsibilities into organizational position descriptions

164.308(a)(3)(i)Workforce Security (Standard)2 targets

→AC-2Account Management

→PS-1Policy and Procedures

+139 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

A NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 to FedRAMP High crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which FedRAMP High controls your existing NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 into FedRAMP High

Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

FedRAMP High into NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2

Not published yet

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 to FedRAMP High (built to order)

$299

per framework pair, one time

Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
Every gap, with what it requires
Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 85% in the header counts how many NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many FedRAMP High controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 comparisons

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 vs SOC 255 mappings NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 vs ISO 27001:202255 mappings NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 vs ISO 27002:202255 mappings NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 555 mappings NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 vs FedRAMP Moderate55 mappings NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.054 mappings NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE54 mappings NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 vs NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH54 mappings

Other FedRAMP High comparisons

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs FedRAMP High323 mappings ISO 27002:2022 vs FedRAMP High319 mappings SOC 2 vs FedRAMP High301 mappings ISO 27001:2022 vs FedRAMP High293 mappings PCI DSS 4.0 vs FedRAMP High266 mappings Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 vs FedRAMP High252 mappings NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs FedRAMP High235 mappings CIS Controls v8 vs FedRAMP High228 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

✓ 686 framework browser
✓ Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
✓ 824 compliance assessments
✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day

Get Started Free

Recommended

$149/month

Professional

✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
✓ Unlimited full-text search
✓ Framework self-assessment
✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports

Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53 ISO 27001 vs NIST CSF CMMC vs NIST 800-53 FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53 NIST CSF vs SOC 2 HIPAA vs NIST 800-53 ISO 27001 vs SOC 2 ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 and FedRAMP High?

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 has 65 controls across its framework, while FedRAMP High covers 410 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 55 overlapping controls (85% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Administrative, where 8 NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 controls have no direct FedRAMP High equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 and FedRAMP High?

Of 65 total NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 controls, 55 map directly to FedRAMP High controls, representing 85% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 to FedRAMP High?

10 NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 controls have no direct equivalent in FedRAMP High. The highest concentration of gaps is in Administrative with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 and FedRAMP High?

The domain with the highest gap count is Administrative (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.