Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5vsEU AI Act

See exactly how NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls map to EU AI Act. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

119
Controls Mapped
181
Gaps Found
29%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 maps to EU AI Act with 29% coverage across 86 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 300 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls identifies 234 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in SC - System and Communications Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 300 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 119 mapped controls across 13 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

AC - Access Control(3 mappings)

NIST800-AC-16Security and Privacy Attributes. Provide the means to associate [organization-defined] with [organization-defined] for information in storage, in process, and/or in transmission; Ensure that the attribute associations are made and retained with the information; Establish
EUAI-Art.50Transparency obligations for providers and deployers of certain AI systems
NIST800-AC-22Publicly accessible content
EUAI-Art.53Obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models
NIST800-AC-5Separation of duties
EUAI-Art.14Human oversight

AT - Awareness and Training(4 mappings)

NIST800-AT-2Literacy training and awareness
EUAI-Art.4AI literacy
NIST800-AT-3Role-based training2 targets
EUAI-Art.26Obligations of deployers of high-risk AI systems
EUAI-Art.4AI literacy
NIST800-AT-4Training records
EUAI-Art.4AI literacy

AU - Audit and Accountability(11 mappings)

NIST800-AU-11Audit record retention3 targets
EUAI-Art.18Documentation keeping
EUAI-Art.19Automatically generated logs
EUAI-Art.26Obligations of deployers of high-risk AI systems
NIST800-AU-12Audit record generation
EUAI-Art.12Record-keeping (logs)
NIST800-AU-2Event logging
EUAI-Art.12Record-keeping (logs)
NIST800-AU-3Content of audit records
EUAI-Art.12Record-keeping (logs)
NIST800-AU-4Audit log storage capacity
EUAI-Art.19Automatically generated logs
NIST800-AU-6Audit record review, analysis, and reporting
EUAI-Art.72Post-market monitoring by providers and post-market monitoring plan for high-risk AI systems
NIST800-AU-8Time stamps
EUAI-Art.12Record-keeping (logs)
NIST800-AU-9Protection of audit information2 targets
EUAI-Art.19Automatically generated logs
EUAI-Art.73Reporting of serious incidents

CA - Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring(2 mappings)

NIST800-CA-2Control assessments2 targets
EUAI-Art.21Cooperation with competent authorities
EUAI-Art.43Conformity assessment

+99 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 to EU AI Act crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which EU AI Act controls your existing NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 into EU AI Act
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

EU AI Act into NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5
8%

24 of 300 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for EU AI Act. 276 are genuine gaps.

29.4%SA - System and Services Acquisition
26.7%AU - Audit and Accountability
37.5%CA - Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring
33.3%IR - Incident Response
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-20. 85 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: NIST800-AU-11 Audit record retention

Logs retained at least six months, longer where other Union law requires.

Grounded in EUAI-Art.19 Automatically generated logs. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: NIST800-AC-1 Access control policy and procedures

Requires an access control policy and supporting procedures to be written, approved, issued to the personnel who must apply them, owned by a named official, and reviewed and reissued on a defined frequency and after defined trigger events,...

Every one of the 24 evidenced controls and 276 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

EU AI Act to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 29% in the header counts how many NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many EU AI Act controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and EU AI Act?

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 has 300 controls across its framework, while EU AI Act covers 43 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 86 overlapping controls (29% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SC - System and Communications Protection, where 47 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls have no direct EU AI Act equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and EU AI Act?

Of 300 total NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls, 86 map directly to EU AI Act controls, representing 29% coverage. The remaining 234 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 to EU AI Act?

234 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls have no direct equivalent in EU AI Act. The highest concentration of gaps is in SC - System and Communications Protection with 47 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and EU AI Act?

The domain with the highest gap count is SC - System and Communications Protection (47 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.