DORAvsEU AI Act
See exactly how DORA controls map to EU AI Act. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
DORA maps to EU AI Act with 38% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 26 DORA controls identifies 16 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in DORA Chapter II: ICT Risk Management.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 26 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
DORA Chapter II: ICT Risk Management(7 mappings)
DORA Chapter III: ICT-Related Incident Management(2 mappings)
DORA Chapter IV: Digital Operational Resilience Testing(2 mappings)
DORA Chapter V: ICT Third-Party Risk Management(2 mappings)
DORA Chapters VI-VII: Information Sharing, Penalties and Data Protection(2 mappings)
A DORA to EU AI Act crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which EU AI Act controls your existing DORA work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 38% in the header counts how many DORA controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many EU AI Act controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other DORA comparisons
Other EU AI Act comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between DORA and EU AI Act?
DORA has 26 controls across its framework, while EU AI Act covers 43 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in DORA Chapter II: ICT Risk Management, where 8 DORA controls have no direct EU AI Act equivalent.
How many controls map between DORA and EU AI Act?
Of 26 total DORA controls, 10 map directly to EU AI Act controls, representing 38% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping DORA to EU AI Act?
16 DORA controls have no direct equivalent in EU AI Act. The highest concentration of gaps is in DORA Chapter II: ICT Risk Management with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between DORA and EU AI Act?
The domain with the highest gap count is DORA Chapter II: ICT Risk Management (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.