Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 42001:2023vsEU AI Act

See exactly how ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls map to EU AI Act. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

112
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
100%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which EU AI Act controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 maps to EU AI Act with 100% coverage across 38 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 38 ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls identifies 50 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Clause A – ISO/IEC 42001:2023.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 38 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 112 mapped controls across 9 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.

Annex A AIMS controls - A.10 Third-party and customer relationships(10 mappings)

iso-iec-42001-2023::A.10.2Allocating responsibilities4 targets
→EUAI-Art.22Authorised representatives of providers of high-risk AI systems
→EUAI-Art.23Obligations of importers
→EUAI-Art.25Responsibilities along the AI value chain
→EUAI-Art.54Authorised representatives of providers of general-purpose AI models
iso-iec-42001-2023::A.10.3Suppliers3 targets
→EUAI-Art.23Obligations of importers
→EUAI-Art.24Obligations of distributors
→EUAI-Art.25Responsibilities along the AI value chain
iso-iec-42001-2023::A.10.4Customers3 targets
→EUAI-Art.13Transparency and provision of information to deployers
→EUAI-Art.24Obligations of distributors
→EUAI-Art.72Post-market monitoring by providers and post-market monitoring plan for high-risk AI systems

Annex A AIMS controls - A.2 Policies related to AI(5 mappings)

iso-iec-42001-2023::A.2.2AI policy2 targets
→EUAI-Art.16Obligations of providers of high-risk AI systems
→EUAI-Art.17Quality management system
iso-iec-42001-2023::A.2.3Alignment with other organizational policies2 targets
→EUAI-Art.17Quality management system
→EUAI-Art.26Obligations of deployers of high-risk AI systems
iso-iec-42001-2023::A.2.4Review of the AI policy
→EUAI-Art.17Quality management system

Annex A AIMS controls - A.3 Internal organization(4 mappings)

iso-iec-42001-2023::A.3.2AI roles and responsibilities2 targets
→EUAI-Art.17Quality management system
→EUAI-Art.26Obligations of deployers of high-risk AI systems
iso-iec-42001-2023::A.3.3Reporting of concerns2 targets
→EUAI-Art.73Reporting of serious incidents
→EUAI-Art.87Reporting of infringements and protection of reporting persons

Annex A AIMS controls - A.4 Resources for AI systems(1 mappings)

iso-iec-42001-2023::A.4.2Resource documentation
→EUAI-Art.11Technical documentation

+92 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 868 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The ISO/IEC 42001:2023 to EU AI Act crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which EU AI Act controls your existing ISO/IEC 42001:2023 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. ISO/IEC 42001:2023 into EU AI Act lands at 39.5%, while EU AI Act into ISO/IEC 42001:2023 lands at 57.9%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your ISO/IEC 42001:2023 evidence buys you for EU AI Act, the other asks the reverse.

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 into EU AI Act
39.5%

17 of 43 EU AI Act controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ISO/IEC 42001:2023. 26 are genuine gaps.

EU AI Act into ISO/IEC 42001:2023
57.9%

22 of 38 ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for EU AI Act. 16 are genuine gaps.

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 to EU AI Act
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 100% in the header counts how many ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many EU AI Act controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 868 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and EU AI Act?

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 has 38 controls across its framework, while EU AI Act covers 43 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 38 overlapping controls (100% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause A – ISO/IEC 42001:2023, where 9 ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls have no direct EU AI Act equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and EU AI Act?

Of 38 total ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls, 38 map directly to EU AI Act controls, representing 100% coverage. The remaining 50 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 42001:2023 to EU AI Act?

50 ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls have no direct equivalent in EU AI Act. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause A – ISO/IEC 42001:2023 with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and EU AI Act?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause A – ISO/IEC 42001:2023 (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.