Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5vsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents

See exactly how NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls map to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

119
Controls Mapped
181
Gaps Found
19%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 maps to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents with 19% coverage across 57 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 300 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls identifies 263 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in SC - System and Communications Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 300 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 119 mapped controls across 16 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

AC - Access Control(11 mappings)

NIST800-AC-17Remote access
ASD37-20Multi-factor authentication (Essential)
NIST800-AC-2Account management2 targets
ASD37-18Restrict administrative privileges (Essential)
ASD37-21Disable local administrator accounts (Excellent)
NIST800-AC-3Access enforcement2 targets
ASD37-18Restrict administrative privileges (Essential)
ASD37-22Network segmentation (Excellent)
NIST800-AC-4Information flow enforcement3 targets
ASD37-08Deny direct internet connectivity (Excellent)
ASD37-22Network segmentation (Excellent)
ASD37-27Outbound data loss prevention (Very Good)
NIST800-AC-6Least privilege3 targets
ASD37-18Restrict administrative privileges (Essential)
ASD37-20Multi-factor authentication (Essential)
ASD37-21Disable local administrator accounts (Excellent)

AT - Awareness and Training(5 mappings)

NIST800-AT-2Literacy training and awareness2 targets
ASD37-15User education (Limited)
ASD37-37Personnel management (Very Good)
NIST800-AT-3Role-based training3 targets
ASD37-18Restrict administrative privileges (Essential)
ASD37-20Multi-factor authentication (Essential)
ASD37-37Personnel management (Very Good)

AU - Audit and Accountability(4 mappings)

NIST800-AU-11Audit record retention
ASD37-33Capture network traffic (Limited)
NIST800-AU-13Monitoring for Information Disclosure. Monitor [organization-defined] [organization-defined] for evidence of unauthorized disclosure of organizational information; and If an information disclosure is discovered: Notify [organization-defined] ; and Take the following additional actions: [organization-defined]
ASD37-27Outbound data loss prevention (Very Good)
NIST800-AU-2Event logging
ASD37-33Capture network traffic (Limited)
NIST800-AU-6Audit record review, analysis, and reporting
ASD37-28Continuous incident detection and response (Excellent)

+99 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls your existing NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 into ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents lands at 86.5%, while ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents into NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 lands at 10.3%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 evidence buys you for ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents, the other asks the reverse.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 into ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents
86.5%

32 of 37 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. 5 are genuine gaps.

88.2%Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution
80%Limiting the Extent of Cyber Security Incidents
83.3%Detecting Cyber Security Incidents and Responding
100%Recovering Data and System Availability
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 58 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: ASD37-01 Application control (Essential)

Least functionality prohibits or restricts the software and functions not essential to the mission.

Grounded in NIST800-CM-7 Least functionality. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: ASD37-05 Automated dynamic analysis of email and web content (Excellent)

Automated dynamic analysis to detonate and analyse content run in a sandbox, e.g. by an email gateway or web proxy. Enrich analysis using reputation and other internet-sourced data.

Every one of the 32 evidenced controls and 5 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents into NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5
10.3%

31 of 300 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents. 269 are genuine gaps.

27.3%SI - System and Information Integrity
28.6%CM - Configuration Management
33.3%CP - Contingency Planning
8.5%SC - System and Communications Protection
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 74 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: NIST800-AC-3 Access enforcement

ASD restricts administrative privileges to operating systems and applications based on user duties.

Grounded in ASD37-18 Restrict administrative privileges (Essential). Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: NIST800-AC-1 Access control policy and procedures

Requires an access control policy and supporting procedures to be written, approved, issued to the personnel who must apply them, owned by a named official, and reviewed and reissued on a defined frequency and after defined trigger events,...

Every one of the 31 evidenced controls and 269 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 19% in the header counts how many NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 has 300 controls across its framework, while ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 57 overlapping controls (19% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SC - System and Communications Protection, where 39 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls have no direct ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?

Of 300 total NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls, 57 map directly to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls, representing 19% coverage. The remaining 263 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?

263 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls have no direct equivalent in ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents. The highest concentration of gaps is in SC - System and Communications Protection with 39 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?

The domain with the highest gap count is SC - System and Communications Protection (39 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.