Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27001:2022vsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents

See exactly how ISO 27001:2022 controls map to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

30
Controls Mapped
65
Gaps Found
17%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27001:2022 maps to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents with 17% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 95 ISO 27001:2022 controls identifies 79 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in A.5 Organizational Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 95 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 30 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

A.5 Organizational Controls(9 mappings)

ISO27001-A.5.17Credential and secret management2 targets
ASD37-20Multi-factor authentication (Essential)
ASD37-23Protect authentication credentials (Excellent)
ISO27001-A.5.24Incident response planning and readiness2 targets
ASD37-31Hunt to discover incidents (Very Good)
ASD37-33Capture network traffic (Limited)
ISO27001-A.5.26Incident containment and remediation2 targets
ASD37-31Hunt to discover incidents (Very Good)
ASD37-33Capture network traffic (Limited)
ISO27001-A.5.27Post-incident review and improvement2 targets
ASD37-31Hunt to discover incidents (Very Good)
ASD37-33Capture network traffic (Limited)
ISO27001-A.5.30Technology readiness for business recovery
ASD37-35Business continuity and disaster recovery plans (Very Good)

A.6 People Controls(1 mappings)

ISO27001-A.6.3Security awareness and competence programmes
ASD37-37Personnel management (Very Good)

A.7 Physical Controls(2 mappings)

ISO27001-A.7.4Physical surveillance and monitoring2 targets
ASD37-29Host-based IDS/IPS (Very Good)
ASD37-32Network-based IDS/IPS (Limited)

A.8 Technological Controls(8 mappings)

ISO27001-A.8.11Sensitive data obfuscation techniques
ASD37-27Outbound data loss prevention (Very Good)
ISO27001-A.8.13Backup strategy and recovery assurance3 targets
ASD37-34Regular backups (Essential)
ASD37-35Business continuity and disaster recovery plans (Very Good)
ASD37-36System recovery capabilities (Very Good)
ISO27001-A.8.14Processing infrastructure high availability
ASD37-20Multi-factor authentication (Essential)
ISO27001-A.8.18Restricted use of system-level utilities2 targets
ASD37-18Restrict administrative privileges (Essential)
ASD37-20Multi-factor authentication (Essential)
ISO27001-A.8.2Elevated privilege governance
ASD37-18Restrict administrative privileges (Essential)

+10 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 27001:2022 comparisons

Other ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 27001:2022 and ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?

ISO 27001:2022 has 95 controls across its framework, while ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in A.5 Organizational Controls, where 34 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27001:2022 and ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?

Of 95 total ISO 27001:2022 controls, 16 map directly to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls — representing 17% coverage. The remaining 79 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27001:2022 to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?

79 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents. The highest concentration of gaps is in A.5 Organizational Controls with 34 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27001:2022 and ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?

The domain with the highest gap count is A.5 Organizational Controls (34 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.