Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3vsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls map to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

65
Controls Mapped
32
Gaps Found
33%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 maps to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents with 33% coverage across 32 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 97 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls identifies 65 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in 03.01 AC (Access Control).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 97 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 65 mapped controls across 12 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

03.01 AC (Access Control)(11 mappings)

03.01.02Access Enforcement
ASD37-18Restrict administrative privileges (Essential)
03.01.03Information Flow Enforcement3 targets
ASD37-08Deny direct internet connectivity (Excellent)
ASD37-22Network segmentation (Excellent)
ASD37-27Outbound data loss prevention (Very Good)
03.01.05Least Privilege2 targets
ASD37-18Restrict administrative privileges (Essential)
ASD37-21Disable local administrator accounts (Excellent)
03.01.06Least Privilege - Privileged Accounts
ASD37-18Restrict administrative privileges (Essential)
03.01.07Least Privilege - Privileged Functions
ASD37-01Application control (Essential)
03.01.12Remote Access2 targets
ASD37-08Deny direct internet connectivity (Excellent)
ASD37-20Multi-factor authentication (Essential)
03.01.20Use of External Systems
ASD37-13Control removable storage media (Very Good)

03.02 AT (Awareness and Training)(2 mappings)

03.02.01Literacy Training and Awareness2 targets
ASD37-15User education (Limited)
ASD37-37Personnel management (Very Good)

03.03 AU (Audit and Accountability)(3 mappings)

03.03.03Audit Record Generation
ASD37-33Capture network traffic (Limited)
03.03.05Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting2 targets
ASD37-28Continuous incident detection and response (Excellent)
ASD37-31Hunt to discover incidents (Very Good)

03.04 CM (Configuration Management)(4 mappings)

03.04.01Baseline Configuration2 targets
ASD37-11Operating system hardening (Very Good)
ASD37-36System recovery capabilities (Very Good)
03.04.02Configuration Settings2 targets
ASD37-03Configure Microsoft Office macro settings (Essential)
ASD37-04User application hardening (Essential)

+45 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls your existing NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 into ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents lands at 70.3%, while ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents into NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 lands at 24.7%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 evidence buys you for ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents, the other asks the reverse.

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 into ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents
70.3%

26 of 37 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3. 11 are genuine gaps.

82.4%Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution
70%Limiting the Extent of Cyber Security Incidents
66.7%Detecting Cyber Security Incidents and Responding
100%Preventing Malicious Insiders
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 44 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: ASD37-01 Application control (Essential)

Authorized software identified with a deny-all allow-by-exception execution policy.

Grounded in 03.04.08 Authorized Software - Allow by Exception. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: ASD37-05 Automated dynamic analysis of email and web content (Excellent)

Automated dynamic analysis to detonate and analyse content run in a sandbox, e.g. by an email gateway or web proxy. Enrich analysis using reputation and other internet-sourced data.

Every one of the 26 evidenced controls and 11 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents into NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3
24.7%

24 of 97 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents. 73 are genuine gaps.

31.2%03.01 AC (Access Control)
40%03.04 CM (Configuration Management)
37.5%03.05 IA (Identification and Authentication)
30%03.13 SC (System and Communications Protection)
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 54 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: 03.01.02 Access Enforcement

ASD enforces access to operating systems and applications strictly according to user duties.

Grounded in ASD37-18 Restrict administrative privileges (Essential). Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: 03.01.01 Account Management

Define, establish, modify, disable, and remove account types; assign managers; specify membership conditions; authorize access; monitor account use; notify managers on triggering events; require re-authorization at defined frequencies.

Every one of the 24 evidenced controls and 73 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 33% in the header counts how many NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 and ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 has 97 controls across its framework, while ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 32 overlapping controls (33% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in 03.01 AC (Access Control), where 9 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls have no direct ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 and ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?

Of 97 total NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls, 32 map directly to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls, representing 33% coverage. The remaining 65 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?

65 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls have no direct equivalent in ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents. The highest concentration of gaps is in 03.01 AC (Access Control) with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 and ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?

The domain with the highest gap count is 03.01 AC (Access Control) (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.