CIS Controls v8vsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents
See exactly how CIS Controls v8 controls map to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
CIS Controls v8 maps to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents with 49% coverage across 75 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 153 CIS Controls v8 controls identifies 78 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in CIS Control 16: Application Software Security.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 153 controls analysed | 969 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 105 control mappings across 15 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 969 frameworks.
CIS Control 10: Malware Defenses(10 mappings)
CIS Control 11: Data Recovery(8 mappings)
CIS Control 12: Network Infrastructure Management(2 mappings)
+85 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 969 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The CIS Controls v8 to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls your existing CIS Controls v8 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. CIS Controls v8 into ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents lands at 67.6%, while ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents into CIS Controls v8 lands at 29.4%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your CIS Controls v8 evidence buys you for ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents, the other asks the reverse.
25 of 37 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls are evidenced by work you have already done for CIS Controls v8. 12 are genuine gaps.
45 of 153 CIS Controls v8 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents. 108 are genuine gaps.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 49% in the header counts how many CIS Controls v8 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other CIS Controls v8 comparisons
Other ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
Cross-framework mappings across 969 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 969 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between CIS Controls v8 and ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?
CIS Controls v8 has 153 controls across its framework, while ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 75 overlapping controls (49% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CIS Control 16: Application Software Security, where 13 CIS Controls v8 controls have no direct ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents equivalent.
How many controls map between CIS Controls v8 and ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?
Of 153 total CIS Controls v8 controls, 75 map directly to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls, representing 49% coverage. The remaining 78 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping CIS Controls v8 to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?
78 CIS Controls v8 controls have no direct equivalent in ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents. The highest concentration of gaps is in CIS Control 16: Application Software Security with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between CIS Controls v8 and ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?
The domain with the highest gap count is CIS Control 16: Application Software Security (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.