Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-30vsGerman Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)

See exactly how NIST SP 800-30 controls map to German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
10
Gaps Found
35%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-30 maps to German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) with 35% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 20 NIST SP 800-30 controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in NIST SP 800-30: Risk Treatment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 20 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

NIST SP 800-30: Risk Framework & Governance(2 mappings)

NIST30-01Risk management policy and scope
LkSG-4.1Risk Management System Establishment
NIST30-05Risk management integration
LkSG-4.1Risk Management System Establishment

NIST SP 800-30: Risk Assessment(6 mappings)

NIST30-07Risk analysis and evaluation2 targets
LkSG-4.3Risk Analysis (Section 5)
LkSG-6.2Preventive Measures for Own Business
NIST30-09Risk scenario development2 targets
LkSG-4.3Risk Analysis (Section 5)
LkSG-6.2Preventive Measures for Own Business
NIST30-10Risk interdependency analysis2 targets
LkSG-4.3Risk Analysis (Section 5)
LkSG-6.2Preventive Measures for Own Business

NIST SP 800-30: Risk Monitoring & Review(2 mappings)

NIST30-18Risk register maintenance
LkSG-4.1Risk Management System Establishment
NIST30-19Continuous improvement of risk processes
LkSG-8.2Remedial Action for Suppliers

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-30 and German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)?

NIST SP 800-30 has 20 controls across its framework, while German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) covers 13 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (35% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in NIST SP 800-30: Risk Treatment, where 5 NIST SP 800-30 controls have no direct German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-30 and German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)?

Of 20 total NIST SP 800-30 controls, 7 map directly to German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) controls — representing 35% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-30 to German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)?

13 NIST SP 800-30 controls have no direct equivalent in German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG). The highest concentration of gaps is in NIST SP 800-30: Risk Treatment with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-30 and German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)?

The domain with the highest gap count is NIST SP 800-30: Risk Treatment (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.