Cross-Framework Mapping

C2M2vsGerman Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)

See exactly how C2M2 controls map to German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
8
Gaps Found
21%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

C2M2 maps to German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) with 21% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 C2M2 controls identifies 19 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in C2M2: Asset Identification & Governance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

C2M2: Access Management(2 mappings)

C2M2-07Personnel risk assessment2 targets
LkSG-4.3Risk Analysis (Section 5)
LkSG-6.2Preventive Measures for Own Business

C2M2: Incident Response & Recovery(2 mappings)

C2M2-18Reporting obligations to authorities2 targets
LkSG-10.1Annual Reporting
LkSG-10.2Public Disclosure

C2M2: Supply Chain & Configuration(12 mappings)

C2M2-21Supply chain risk management for critical components4 targets
LkSG-4.1Risk Management System Establishment
LkSG-6.3Preventive Measures for Direct Suppliers
LkSG-7.1Indirect Supplier Due Diligence
LkSG-8.2Remedial Action for Suppliers
C2M2-23Change management procedures3 targets
LkSG-6.3Preventive Measures for Direct Suppliers
LkSG-7.1Indirect Supplier Due Diligence
LkSG-8.2Remedial Action for Suppliers
C2M2-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems5 targets
LkSG-4.3Risk Analysis (Section 5)
LkSG-6.2Preventive Measures for Own Business
LkSG-6.3Preventive Measures for Direct Suppliers
LkSG-7.1Indirect Supplier Due Diligence
LkSG-8.2Remedial Action for Suppliers

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between C2M2 and German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)?

C2M2 has 24 controls across its framework, while German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) covers 13 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in C2M2: Asset Identification & Governance, where 5 C2M2 controls have no direct German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) equivalent.

How many controls map between C2M2 and German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)?

Of 24 total C2M2 controls, 5 map directly to German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) controls — representing 21% coverage. The remaining 19 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping C2M2 to German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)?

19 C2M2 controls have no direct equivalent in German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG). The highest concentration of gaps is in C2M2: Asset Identification & Governance with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between C2M2 and German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)?

The domain with the highest gap count is C2M2: Asset Identification & Governance (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.