Cross-Framework Mapping

Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)vsGerman Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)

See exactly how Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) controls map to German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

25
Controls Mapped
14
Gaps Found
21%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) maps to German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) with 21% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 39 Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Reporting Obligations.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 39 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 25 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Reporting Obligations(11 mappings)

MSA-13Mandatory Reporting Obligation5 targets
LkSG-10.1Annual Reporting
LkSG-10.2Public Disclosure
LkSG-4.3Risk Analysis (Section 5)
LkSG-6.1Policy Statement
LkSG-9.1Complaints Procedure
MSA-14Joint Statements3 targets
LkSG-4.3Risk Analysis (Section 5)
LkSG-6.1Policy Statement
LkSG-9.1Complaints Procedure
MSA-15Voluntary Statements3 targets
LkSG-4.3Risk Analysis (Section 5)
LkSG-6.1Policy Statement
LkSG-9.1Complaints Procedure

Mandatory Reporting Criteria(6 mappings)

MSA-16-1bCriterion 2: Structure, Operations and Supply Chains3 targets
LkSG-6.3Preventive Measures for Direct Suppliers
LkSG-7.1Indirect Supplier Due Diligence
LkSG-8.2Remedial Action for Suppliers
MSA-16-1cCriterion 3: Modern Slavery Risks3 targets
LkSG-6.3Preventive Measures for Direct Suppliers
LkSG-7.1Indirect Supplier Due Diligence
LkSG-8.2Remedial Action for Suppliers

Definitions and Scope(3 mappings)

MSA-5Definition of Modern Slavery3 targets
LkSG-4.3Risk Analysis (Section 5)
LkSG-6.1Policy Statement
LkSG-9.1Complaints Procedure

+5 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) comparisons

Other German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) and German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)?

Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) has 39 controls across its framework, while German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) covers 13 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Reporting Obligations, where 14 Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) controls have no direct German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) equivalent.

How many controls map between Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) and German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)?

Of 39 total Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) controls, 8 map directly to German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) controls — representing 21% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) to German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)?

31 Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) controls have no direct equivalent in German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG). The highest concentration of gaps is in Reporting Obligations with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) and German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Reporting Obligations (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.