TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
20
Gaps Found
29%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) with 29% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 25 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

System Protection and Communications(8 mappings)

3.10Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit
→NAIC-2Information Security Program (ISP) - Section 4
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup
→NAIC-5Third Party Service Provider Oversight - Section 4(F)(3) and Section 5
FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection2 targets
→NAIC-1NAIC Model Law Adoption, Scope, and Licensee Definitions
→NAIC-2Information Security Program (ISP) - Section 4
FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest2 targets
→NAIC-1NAIC Model Law Adoption, Scope, and Licensee Definitions
→NAIC-2Information Security Program (ISP) - Section 4
FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity2 targets
→NAIC-1NAIC Model Law Adoption, Scope, and Licensee Definitions
→NAIC-2Information Security Program (ISP) - Section 4

Audit, Assessment, and Monitoring(3 mappings)

3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest2 targets
→NAIC-1NAIC Model Law Adoption, Scope, and Licensee Definitions
→NAIC-2Information Security Program (ISP) - Section 4
3.3.1Audit Record Creation
→NAIC-2Information Security Program (ISP) - Section 4

Incident Response and Media Protection(1 mappings)

3.6Encrypt Data on End-User Devices
→NAIC-5Third Party Service Provider Oversight - Section 4(F)(3) and Section 5

Access Control and Identification(3 mappings)

3.7Establish and Maintain a Data Classification Scheme
→NAIC-1NAIC Model Law Adoption, Scope, and Licensee Definitions
3.7.1Key generation procedures2 targets
→NAIC-1NAIC Model Law Adoption, Scope, and Licensee Definitions
→NAIC-6Cybersecurity Event Investigation and Notification - Sections 6 and 7

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security20 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 518 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs MTCS (Singapore)17 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST Privacy Framework16 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14615 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14515 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14415 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ISMAP (Japan)15 mappings

Other NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) comparisons

OWASP MASVS vs NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)4 mappingsOWASP ASVS vs NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)4 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)4 mappingsDAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) vs NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)4 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)4 mappingsISO/SAE 21434 vs NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)4 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)4 mappingsISO 27017 vs NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)4 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (29% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 10 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 10 map directly to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls — representing 29% coverage. The remaining 25 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

25 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668). The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.