TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

47
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
60%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments with 60% coverage across 21 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 47 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

System Protection and Communications(19 mappings)

3.10Physical and Environmental Protection4 targets
→CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue
→KR-CSAP-SC-02Infrastructure and Network Security
→MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection
→PAS1192-5-SC-01Technical Controls
FEDRAMP-CM-1Configuration Management Policy2 targets
→CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue
→NRC73-CTL-03Configuration Management
FEDRAMP-CM-2Baseline Configuration2 targets
→CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue
→NRC73-CTL-03Configuration Management
FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
→NRC73-CTL-01Access Control for CDAs
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup
→NRC73-CTL-01Access Control for CDAs
FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection3 targets
→MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection
→NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud
→PAS1192-5-SC-01Technical Controls
FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest3 targets
→MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection
→NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud
→PAS1192-5-SC-01Technical Controls
FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity3 targets
→MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection
→NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud
→PAS1192-5-SC-01Technical Controls

Audit, Assessment, and Monitoring(1 mappings)

3.11Risk Assessment
→KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management

+27 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202121 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange20 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)20 mappings

Other PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments comparisons

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments17 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments17 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments17 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments16 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappingsOman National Cybersecurity Framework vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 21 overlapping controls (60% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 7 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 21 map directly to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls — representing 60% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

14 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.