TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

23
Controls Mapped
12
Gaps Found
29%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity with 29% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 25 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 23 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Audit, Assessment, and Monitoring(6 mappings)

3.12Segment Data Processing and Storage Based on Sensitivity
→RG5.71-C.7Continuous Monitoring
3.3Configure Data Access Control Lists5 targets
→NRC7354-2Critical Digital Asset (CDA) Identification, Scope, and Boundary
→NRC7354-4Security Controls Implementation per NRC RG 5.71 Appendix B/C
→RG5.71-C.3Cyber Security Training
→RG5.71-C.5Recovery and Restoration
→RG5.71-C.6Configuration Management

Awareness, Training, and Personnel(1 mappings)

3.2.1Account data storage is kept to a minimum through implementation of data retention and disposal policies, procedures, and processes that include at least the following: • Coverage for all locations of stored account data.
→RG5.71-C.3Cyber Security Training

Incident Response and Media Protection(3 mappings)

3.6Encrypt Data on End-User Devices2 targets
→RG5.71-C.4Incident Response Plan
→RG5.71-C.5Recovery and Restoration
3.6.1Procedures are defined and implemented to protect cryptographic keys used to protect stored account data against disclosure and misuse that include: • Access to keys is restricted to the fewest number of custodians necessary.
→RG5.71-C.4Incident Response Plan

Access Control and Identification(1 mappings)

3.7.1Key-management policies and procedures are implemented to include generation of strong cryptographic keys used to protect stored account data
→RG5.71-C.3Cyber Security Training

System Protection and Communications(9 mappings)

FEDRAMP-CM-1Configuration Management Policy
→RG5.71-C.6Configuration Management
FEDRAMP-CM-2Baseline Configuration
→RG5.71-C.6Configuration Management
FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings5 targets
→NRC7354-2Critical Digital Asset (CDA) Identification, Scope, and Boundary
→NRC7354-4Security Controls Implementation per NRC RG 5.71 Appendix B/C
→RG5.71-C.3Cyber Security Training
→RG5.71-C.5Recovery and Restoration
→RG5.71-C.6Configuration Management
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup2 targets
→NRC7354-2Critical Digital Asset (CDA) Identification, Scope, and Boundary
→NRC7354-4Security Controls Implementation per NRC RG 5.71 Appendix B/C

+3 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

A NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements to NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity controls your existing NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements into NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity into NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements to NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 29% in the header counts how many NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security20 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs South Korea ISMS-P20 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 518 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs MTCS (Singapore)17 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST Privacy Framework16 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14615 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14515 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14415 mappings

Other NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity comparisons

Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity7 mappingsISO 27018 vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity7 mappingsISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity7 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity7 mappingsNIST SP 800-190 vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity7 mappingsISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity7 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity7 mappingsISO 27017 vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity7 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 686 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity?

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity covers 33 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (29% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 11 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 10 map directly to NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity controls, representing 29% coverage. The remaining 25 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements to NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity?

25 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.