TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
17
Gaps Found
43%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 43% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 20 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

System Protection and Communications(6 mappings)

3.10Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)
FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))

Audit, Assessment, and Monitoring(7 mappings)

3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest4 targets
→FTC-Safeguards-EffectiveDate-Small-InstitutionEffective Date, Small Institution Exemption and Sectoral Coordination (16 CFR 314.5, 314.6)
→FTC-Safeguards-IR-Plan-BoardReporting-FTC-NotificationWritten Incident Response Plan + Board Reporting + FTC Breach Notification (16 CFR 314.4(h), (i), (j))
→FTC-Safeguards-Risk-AssessmentWritten Risk Assessment (16 CFR 314.4(b))
→FTC-Safeguards-ServiceProvider-EvaluationService Provider Oversight + Program Evaluation + Personnel Training (16 CFR 314.4(d-g))
3.12Segment Data Processing and Storage Based on Sensitivity
→FTC-Safeguards-ServiceProvider-EvaluationService Provider Oversight + Program Evaluation + Personnel Training (16 CFR 314.4(d-g))
3.3Configure Data Access Control Lists
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)
3.3.1Audit Record Creation
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))

Awareness, Training, and Personnel(1 mappings)

3.2.1Account data storage minimised
→FTC-Safeguards-ServiceProvider-EvaluationService Provider Oversight + Program Evaluation + Personnel Training (16 CFR 314.4(d-g))

Incident Response and Media Protection(2 mappings)

3.6Encrypt Data on End-User Devices
→FTC-Safeguards-IR-Plan-BoardReporting-FTC-NotificationWritten Incident Response Plan + Board Reporting + FTC Breach Notification (16 CFR 314.4(h), (i), (j))
3.6.1Incident Response Capability
→FTC-Safeguards-IR-Plan-BoardReporting-FTC-NotificationWritten Incident Response Plan + Board Reporting + FTC Breach Notification (16 CFR 314.4(h), (i), (j))

Access Control and Identification(2 mappings)

3.7Establish and Maintain a Data Classification Scheme
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
3.7.1Key generation procedures
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security20 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 518 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs MTCS (Singapore)17 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST Privacy Framework16 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14615 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14515 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14415 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ISMAP (Japan)15 mappings

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsVermont Artificial Intelligence and Consumer Data Act (AICDA) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsLey Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia DPDP Act vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 2022 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (43% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 9 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 15 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 43% coverage. The remaining 20 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

20 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.