Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3vsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

157
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
91%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 91% coverage across 88 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 97 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls identifies 9 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in 03.01 AC (Access Control).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 97 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 157 mapped controls across 17 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.

03.01 AC (Access Control)(16 mappings)

03.01.01Account Management3 targets
→NIST-CSF-DE.CM-03Personnel activity and technology usage are monitored to find potentially adverse events
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed by the organization
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties
03.01.02Access Enforcement
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties
03.01.03Information Flow Enforcement2 targets
→NIST-CSF-ID.AM-03Representations of the organization's authorized network communication and internal and external network data flows are maintained
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-01Networks and environments are protected from unauthorized logical access and usage
03.01.04Separation of Duties2 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RR-02Roles, responsibilities, and authorities related to cybersecurity risk management are established, communicated, understood, and enforced
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties
03.01.05Least Privilege
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties
03.01.06Least Privilege - Privileged Accounts
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties
03.01.07Least Privilege - Privileged Functions
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties
03.01.08Unsuccessful Logon Attempts
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-03Users, services, and hardware are authenticated
03.01.12Remote Access
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-01Networks and environments are protected from unauthorized logical access and usage
03.01.16Wireless Access
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-01Networks and environments are protected from unauthorized logical access and usage
03.01.18Access Control for Mobile Devices
→NIST-CSF-PR.DS-01The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-at-rest are protected
03.01.20Use of External Systems
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-05Requirements to address cybersecurity risks in supply chains are established, prioritized, and integrated into contracts and other types of agreements with suppliers and other relevant third parties

03.02 AT (Awareness and Training)(2 mappings)

03.02.01Literacy Training and Awareness
→NIST-CSF-PR.AT-01Personnel are provided with awareness and training so that they possess the knowledge and skills to perform general tasks with cybersecurity risks in mind
03.02.02Role-Based Training
→NIST-CSF-PR.AT-02Individuals in specialized roles are provided with awareness and training so that they possess the knowledge and skills to perform relevant tasks with cybersecurity risks in mind

03.03 AU (Audit and Accountability)(2 mappings)

03.03.01Event Logging2 targets
→NIST-CSF-DE.AE-03Information is correlated from multiple sources
→NIST-CSF-PR.PS-04Log records are generated and made available for continuous monitoring

+137 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 868 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls your existing NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 into NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
46.2%

49 of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3. 57 are genuine gaps.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 into NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3
46.4%

45 of 97 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. 52 are genuine gaps.

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 91% in the header counts how many NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 868 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 has 97 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 88 overlapping controls (91% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in 03.01 AC (Access Control), where 4 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 97 total NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls, 88 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, representing 91% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

9 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in 03.01 AC (Access Control) with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is 03.01 AC (Access Control) (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.