Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1vsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar

See exactly how NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls map to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

156
Controls Mapped
35
Gaps Found
51%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 maps to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar with 51% coverage across 98 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 191 NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls identifies 93 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in C-SCRM Family: Program Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 191 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 156 mapped controls across 17 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.

C-SCRM Family: Access Control(20 mappings)

161R1-AC-17Remote Access
→SEC03-BP09Share resources securely with a third party
161R1-AC-2Account Management3 targets
→SEC02-BP04Rely on a centralized identity provider
→SEC03-BP04Reduce permissions continuously
→SEC03-BP06Manage access based on lifecycle
161R1-AC-20Use of External Systems3 targets
→SEC01-BP05Reduce security management scope
→SEC03-BP07Analyze public and cross-account access
→SEC03-BP09Share resources securely with a third party
161R1-AC-21Information Sharing
→SEC03-BP08Share resources securely within your organization
161R1-AC-22Publicly Accessible Content
→SEC03-BP07Analyze public and cross-account access
161R1-AC-24Access Control Decisions
→SEC02-BP06Employ user groups and attributes
161R1-AC-3Access Enforcement5 targets
→SEC03-BP01Define access requirements
→SEC03-BP02Grant least privilege access
→SEC03-BP05Define permission guardrails for your organization
→SEC03-BP09Share resources securely with a third party
→SEC08-BP04Enforce access control
161R1-AC-4Information Flow Enforcement4 targets
→SEC03-BP07Analyze public and cross-account access
→SEC03-BP08Share resources securely within your organization
→SEC05-BP02Control traffic flow within your network layers
→SEC08-BP04Enforce access control
161R1-AC-5Separation of Duties
→SEC11-BP06Deploy software programmatically

+136 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 868 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls your existing NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 into AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar
28.6%

18 of 63 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1. 45 are genuine gaps.

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar into NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1
20.9%

40 of 191 NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. 151 are genuine gaps.

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 51% in the header counts how many NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 868 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 has 191 controls across its framework, while AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar covers 63 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 98 overlapping controls (51% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in C-SCRM Family: Program Management, where 23 NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls have no direct AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

Of 191 total NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls, 98 map directly to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, representing 51% coverage. The remaining 93 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

93 NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls have no direct equivalent in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. The highest concentration of gaps is in C-SCRM Family: Program Management with 23 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

The domain with the highest gap count is C-SCRM Family: Program Management (23 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.