TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 1800-32vsNIST SP 800-39

See exactly how NIST SP 1800-32 controls map to NIST SP 800-39. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
40
Gaps Found
7%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 1800-32 maps to NIST SP 800-39 with 7% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 44 NIST SP 1800-32 controls identifies 41 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Protect.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 44 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

NIST SP 1800-32: Access Management(1 mappings)

NIST1800-32-07Personnel risk assessment
→NISTSP39-3Risk Assessing: Organisation, Mission, and System Level Assessments

NIST SP 1800-32: Supply Chain & Configuration(3 mappings)

NIST1800-32-21Supply chain risk management for critical components2 targets
→NISTSP39-4Risk Responding: Identify, Evaluate, Decide, Implement
→NISTSP39-5Risk Monitoring: Effectiveness, Changes, Compliance, and Reassessment Triggers
NIST1800-32-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems
→NISTSP39-3Risk Assessing: Organisation, Mission, and System Level Assessments

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 1800-32 comparisons

NIST SP 1800-32 vs API 116416 mappingsNIST SP 1800-32 vs ISO 2701916 mappingsNIST SP 1800-32 vs IEC 6244316 mappingsNIST SP 1800-32 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security15 mappingsNIST SP 1800-32 vs ISO 27001:202214 mappingsNIST SP 1800-32 vs TSA Pipeline Security14 mappingsNIST SP 1800-32 vs South Korea ISMS-P13 mappingsNIST SP 1800-32 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 513 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-39 comparisons

ISO 27005 vs NIST SP 800-393 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs NIST SP 800-393 mappingsAS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System vs NIST SP 800-393 mappingsISO/IEC 27003:2017 vs NIST SP 800-393 mappingsISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management vs NIST SP 800-393 mappingsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management vs NIST SP 800-393 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-393 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-393 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 700 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 1800-32 and NIST SP 800-39?

NIST SP 1800-32 has 44 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-39 covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Protect, where 6 NIST SP 1800-32 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-39 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 1800-32 and NIST SP 800-39?

Of 44 total NIST SP 1800-32 controls, 3 map directly to NIST SP 800-39 controls — representing 7% coverage. The remaining 41 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 1800-32 to NIST SP 800-39?

41 NIST SP 1800-32 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-39. The highest concentration of gaps is in Protect with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 1800-32 and NIST SP 800-39?

The domain with the highest gap count is Protect (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.